02-16-99 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

his client only added lubricant on the boxes. Barnes said the applicant was not asking for outside storage. Once Kolstad modifies the boxes, the boxes are immediately taken from the premises. The actual assembly and fabrication are modification processes of an existing product. Baker stated he appreciated Barnes’ clarification. . Motion by Baker, seconded by Schopf , 4 Ayes - 0 Nays. Motion Carried. TO DENY THE APPEAL Public Hearings Minor Subdivision Richard Brickner Teague outlined the planning report concerning a request for a minor subdivision to divide property located between Long Lake Road and 12th Avenue NW into two lots of record. Teague showed photos of the site. Baker asked the applicant if he had anything to add to Teague’s comments. Rick Brickner, the applicant, answered he had nothing to add. Brickner said the staff’s conditions were acceptable. Baker stated this is a public hearing and asked if anyone in the audience wanted to speak on the issue. No one responded. PH. Motion by Baker, seconded by Schmitz, 4 Ayes - 0 Nays. Motion TO CLOSE THE UBLIC EARING Carried. PL-249, Motion by Schopf, seconded by Schmitz, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF SUBJECT TO . 4 Ayes - 0 Nays. Motion Carried. CONDITIONS Special Use Permit & Site Plan Review Hiawatha Oil (Phillips 66) Teague reviewed the planning report concerning a request for a special use permit and site plan review to tear down the existing Tank-n-Tummy and construct a new convenience gasoline facility with a canopy, car wash, and office space. The subject property is located at 201 County Road E2. Teague showed photos of the site. Schiferl asked about Teague’s reaction to the letter requesting that the exit door be open during the drying cycle. Teague answered he just received the letter and had not had a chance to review it. Teague said, however, that staff would be concerned that this request may generate the same problems as the car wash on Silver Lake Road and Mississippi Street. The complaints generated from the Silver Lake Road car wash concerned vacuum cleaner noise. Teague stated that the applicant was proposing that the car wash be closed from 11:00 p.m. to 5:00 a.m. Teague said staff was proposing the shut down hours conform with the City’s noise ordinance, which would prohibit operation of the car wash between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Baker asked Richmond if he had reviewed staff’s recommendation. Richmond stated he had done so. Baker asked if he agreed with the recommendation. Richmond responded that closing the door during the drying cycle would not be possible. Baker asked Richmond to explain why closing the door would not be possible. Richmond responded that closing the door is possible, but the car wash time would have to be increased by two minutes per car. Baker asked if the applicant could lengthen the car wash building. Richmond replied the site is not big enough to make the building 25 feet longer. Richmond stated that, at most car washes, opening the door signals to the driver to move out of the carwash. Customers could just sit there and not proceed through the dryer phase. The radius for entering and exiting the car wash is tight. Baker stated this is a public hearing and asked if anyone in the audience wanted to speak on the issue. 2 I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\MINUTES\1999\02-16-99.WPD