My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-15-97
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Minutes-Board Or Commission PLZ 00900
>
1997
>
07-15-97
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2007 12:56:01 PM
Creation date
5/24/2007 12:56:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />APPR <br /> Minutes <br />OVED <br /> <br /> New Brighton Planning Commission <br /> Regular Meeting - July 15, 1997 <br /> 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />Call to Order <br /> <br /> <br />Roll Call <br /> Present: <br /> <br />Larry Baker, Joann Knuth, Mike Livingston, Jim O’Brien, Paul Zisla <br /> <br />Absent: <br /> Norm Schiferl, David Schmitz <br />: <br />Also Present <br /> Erny Mattila, City Planner <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Approval of Minutes <br />J17,1997,. <br />Motion by Livingston, seconded by Zisla, 5 <br />TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE UNE MEETING <br />Ayes - 0 Nays. Motion Carried. <br /> <br />Report on Council Action <br />No report. <br /> <br />Agenda Review <br />The agenda was approved as written. <br /> <br />Public Hearings <br />VN-314 Robert Kallestad <br />P <br />Motion by O’Brien, seconded by Livingston, <br />TO CONTINUE THE UBLIC HEARING UNTIL THE <br />A 19,1997,PC <br />. <br />UGUST LANNING OMMISSION MEETING <br /> <br />Zisla asked if a letter had been sent out confirming the applicant required the continuance. Mattila responded <br />that the City Attorney sent out notification to the other parties involved in the mediation and the law suit and <br />to the attorneys representing those parties. <br /> <br />Zisla asked Mattila to clarify his remark, as he was unaware of the legal situation. Mattila stated the purpose <br />of this proposed variance was a result of a day-long mediation with Mr. Kallestad, who owns the old Print <br />Craft building on Old Highway 8. Many resolutions were passed in the late ‘70's that were not recorded with <br />the property for variances granted to allow Bel Air Builders to build a building down the hill behind the old <br />Print Craft building. These actions caused some confusion about parking. The City, Bel Air Builders, and the <br />Petersons, who own Bob’s Auto and occupy the old Bel Air Builders building, were then sued by Mr. <br />Kallestad. That suit went to a day-long mediation. Because of the mediation, Bel Air Builders agreed to pave <br />the fenced in area at the bottom of the lot for Mr. Kallestad to park his cars. Mr. Peterson agreed to let Mr. <br />Kallestad use that area for parking. Mr. Kallestad requested City Staff to bring forward to the Planning <br />Commission and City Council a proposal for a 6-foot variance in the front <br /> <br />I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\MINUTES\1997\07-15-97.WPD <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.