My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06_15_04
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Minutes-Board Or Commission PLZ 00900
>
2004
>
06_15_04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2007 1:39:03 PM
Creation date
5/24/2007 1:39:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. <br />Motion by O’Brien, Second by Zisla to <br />CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING <br /> <br />. <br />6Ayes, 0 Nays, <br /> MOTION CARRIED <br /> <br />Motion by O’Brien, Second by Zisla to <br /> WAIVE THE READING AND ADOPT THE <br />ATTACHED RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE NONCONFORMING USE <br />NC-02-02LP04-04 <br />PERMIT AND SITE PLAN AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING <br />: <br />CONDITIONS <br /> <br /> <br />1.Review by and compliance with Rice Creek Watershed District. <br /> <br />2.A drawing for the west elevation is submitted and approved by the City <br />Planner. <br /> <br />3.A permit is applied for and approved by the City Engineer for the new curb <br />cut. <br /> <br />4.An ADA parking stall is added and drafted on submitted building permit <br />plans. <br /> <br />5.Landscape plans are resubmitted to be approved by the City Planner. <br /> <br />,. <br />6 Ayes, 0 Nays <br /> MOTION CARRIED <br /> <br /> <br />General Business: <br />Overlay Discussion for R-1, Single Family Residential Zone – Research and review <br />of setback standards, lot coverage and yard definitions. Patrick Boylan, City Planner. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission and the New Brighton City Council at their respective <br />May meetings, directed City Staff to research and provide code options whereby the <br />City Code might be amended to allow additional diversity of house, garage, <br />accessory structure design on large lake lots. They were to focus on bulk coverage <br />requirements, quantity of detached accessory structures and review of “yard” <br />definitions. <br /> <br />th <br />At the June 15 meeting, Mr. Boylan presented some options to Commissioners, <br />based on his research and study of the subject. (See attached Planning Report). <br /> <br />The Commissioners studiously discussed the information presented, including review <br />of maps, definitions of riparian lots, information provided on codes of other cities, <br />similar options for other types of large lots. What is the front yard, road side or <br />lakeside? Lot size vs. buildable lot size. Could applicants redesign their structures <br />to make them conform? Could property owners use off site storage instead of <br />building accessory structures? <br /> <br />After much discussion, it was the consensus of the Commissioners to have staff <br />report to the City Council on the above. They also seek more information on an area <br />such as Lake Minnetonka. Commissioners want to move slowly on any changes, so <br />as not to create a bigger problem than they would be solving. <br />2 <br />I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\Minutes\2004\06_15_04.doc <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.