09_21_04 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3.No commercial or home occupation activity shall be conducted within the accessory building. 4.The City Manager will make a determination of front yard / back yard of this residential riparian lot. Motion Carried. 6Ayes, 0 Nays, Public Hearing: SP 04-10 Special Use Permit for a proposed front yard encroachment - Ms. Jennifer Tenenbaum Consideration of an application for a Special Use Permit to construct an addition onto the existing home at 2015 Long Lake Road NW. The site is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. The proposed addition encroaches into the required 30 foot front yard setback. Section 4-040 (3) B states that in required front yards, the required setback may be reduced to twenty-four feet subject to the approval of a Special use Permit and conditions found in Section 4-040 (3) B 1-4. The applicant is proposing to add onto the kitchen, which is proposed to encroach into the front yard setback by 2 feet. This addition is part of a larger project where a second story is planned to be built. Mr. Boylan reviewed the background information and site plan for the Commissioners and audience. The applicant was present. No one wished to speak to the issue from the audience. Motion by Baker, second by O’Brien to CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. Motion Carried. 6 Ayes, 0 Nays, Hearing no further discussion, Motion by Mann, second by Howard, to WAIVE THE READING AND ADOPT THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SP 04-10. Motion Carried. 6 Ayes, 0 Nays, Public Hearing: SP 04-12 / NC04-04 – Special Use Permit for a proposed detached garage larger than 464 sq. ft.. – Mike and Janell Zappa. Consideration of an application for a Special Use Permit to construct a garage larger than rd 624 sq. ft. on a single family lot at 721 3 Avenue NW. The site is zoned R-1A, Single Family Residential. The applicant wishes to expand the existing detached garage to a total of 1,038 sq. ft. Mr. Boylan reviewed the background information and site plan for the Commissioners and audience. The applicant did not submit detailed elevation drawings of the attached garage. The applicants were present. No one in the audience spoke to the issue and staff had received no communications about the proposal. Motion by Baker, second by O’Brien to CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. Motion Carried. 6 Ayes, 0 Nays, There was some additional discussion among the Commission regarding the roof and overall design of the garage. Commissioners directed the applicant to consider the design and submit new elevation drawings to the City Planner before the Council considers the application. 2 I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\Minutes\2004\09_21_04.doc