My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-18-2006 MINUTES
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Minutes-Board Or Commission PLZ 00900
>
2006
>
04-18-2006 MINUTES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2007 2:12:53 PM
Creation date
5/24/2007 2:12:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Approved <br />Chapter 26 of the City Code, which regulates the subdivision land, establishes park land <br />dedication requirements for all new residential development. These requirements date <br />back to the 1980’s, however the fees never were imposed for commercial or industrial <br />zoned property. While it is recognized that users of commercial and industrial zoned <br />property benefit from the City’s park system it became necessary to require a land and/or <br />cash dedication at the time of subdivision. The attached Zoning Ordinance amendment <br />establishes park land dedication requirements, in the form of land and/or cash <br />contributions, for all newly subdivided commercial and industrial property. <br /> <br />Much like the current residential dedication requirements, the proposed language requires <br />ten percent of the total land being subdivided for dedication for parks, recreation, and <br />usable open space. The City has the option to consider payment of a reasonable amount <br />in lieu of land dedication where appropriate. The amount of land and/or cash <br />contribution is based on the specific characteristics of the proposed subdivision and its <br />intended use. <br /> <br />Baker inquired who would determine if the applicant should give land or a cash <br />dedication. Fernelius replied that the City would decide if the applicant can dedicate land <br />or cash. Zisla asked how the amount of ten percent was decided. Gundlach replied the <br />ten percent is based on what the residential applicants pay and a study done by Ingraham <br />and Associates show that several cities in the area also charge ten percent. Zisla inquired <br />if it was ten percent of the land area or ten percent of the market value. Gundlach replied <br />that it’s ten percent of the land being developed and if there is a cash dedication then it <br />would be based off of the current market value. Zisla asked if in her research if she had <br />uncovered anything that explains how the ten percent is related to the needs created by <br />the use being developed on the property. Gundlach replied that she did not find anything <br />in her research. Fernelius stated that New Brighton is one of the few cities that do not <br />charge a commercial park dedication fee. He added that this ordinance would only take <br />effect if the land is subdivided, which has not happened in the last two years that he <br />knows of. Northwest Quadrant will generate this fee, since it will be subdivided, and it <br />will help pay for the public art that has been discussed at previous meetings. <br /> <br />Schiferl replied that there should be a per unit charge for residential rather than a <br />percentage base and it should be less for commercial. Fernelius replied that the City does <br />have a fee per unit noted within the ordinance, but one is noted within the City’s Fee <br />Registrar. Zisla inquired how the City arrived at the fee for residential. Fernelius replied <br />that the current fee is based on a survey of surrounding communities that was done by the <br />former Parks and Recreation Director. Zisla replied that the amount of ten percent is <br />arbitrary and the City needs to show how that money will be used. He added that just <br />because surrounding communities are charging that price for the park dedication does not <br />mean that New Brighton should with out showing the need for the support. Fernelius <br />replied that he is not aware of any fee studies that have been done that relate to park <br />dedication and the need for support, but staff would be willing to look into it more if <br />directed by the Commission. Zisla replied that he is concerned with the need not of the <br />I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\Minutes\2006\04-18-2006 MINUTES.doc <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.