My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-15-2006
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Minutes-Board Or Commission PLZ 00900
>
2006
>
08-15-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2007 2:18:08 PM
Creation date
5/24/2007 2:18:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Approved <br />that the intention all along is that it would be hauled off site if it exceeds storage capacity, <br />and the City attorney has been briefed about such concerns while he is preparing the <br />agreement. Schiferl asked for a clarification of the public and private roads. Gundlach <br />stated that the private roads are the two interior roads that run in between the town <br />homes, the ring road, and a small bump out road on the northern end of the development. <br />Howard asked for a clarification of how the development will tie into the Long Lake <br />Regional Park trails and how they will treat the rail road tracks. Gundlach replied that <br />there is an at grade trail connection at the northern end of the site, a pedestrian bridge <br />crossing over the rail road tracks at the center of the development, and a possible tunnel <br />at the southern end of the site. Schiferl inquired what crossing would be suitable for <br />bicycles, besides the at grade crossing. Fernelius replied that the plan for the connection <br />the park at the southern end of the development will be a tunnel under the existing rail <br />road pass is also bike friendly. The staff will have to work with the rail road and possibly <br />MNDOT to provide the proper access. O’Keefe inquired if any of the pedestrian <br />connections being built are in the Developers Agreement. Fernelius replied that this is <br />an issue that is being addressed in the Redevelopment Contract and the Developers have <br />requested clarification on the City’s timeline for installation for those improvements. He <br />added that the rail road, county, MNDOT, and the City are all parties that will be <br />involved with this process and the trails are not part of this approval. <br /> <br />Theresa Greenfield, Director of Land Development for Rottlund Homes, requested <br />approval of the PUD, Final Plat, and Special Use Permit. She reported that they have <br />included several sustainable design plans in the development. By moving the buildings <br />around they were able to create more open space which decreases the amount of <br />impervious materials, an infiltration pond has been added south of the senior condos, the <br />units are smaller and thus more efficient to operate and require less natural resources to <br />build, the irrigation system will have rain sensors, some drought tolerant plants will be <br />planted, drip irrigation placed in the medians, the home owners association will be <br />required to contract for recycling, use of certified lumber, and recycled OSB board. <br />These are some of the highlighted sustainable designs that they are using, when the <br />construction plans are laid out the details on this issue will be more in depth. David <br />Bernard and Sherman Associates have provided sample boards and brick that she will <br />leave with the City for any citizens to look at. The David Bernard Builders sales trailer <br />will be on site soon and will be open for business for the Fall Parade of homes. <br /> <br />Schiferl inquired if the developers plan on doing construction waste recycling. <br />Greenfield stated that David Bernard and Associates is currently taking bids from several <br />companies and will compare those bids to the cost of the recycling program that the <br />company is currently using at its other development sites. <br /> <br />Howard asked staff to clarify where the trail easements would be located. Gundlach <br />replied that in Tract 1 the trail running along the rail road tracks to the south from the <br />central green area and any trails that are not part of the public right of way will need to be <br />dedicated as part of Track 1, which will be prepared by the Developers and submitted for <br />I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\Minutes\2006\08-15-2006.docPage 9 of 14 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.