Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Approved <br /> <br />W <br />Motion by O’Brien, Second by Schiferl <br />AIVE THE READING AND ADOPT THE <br />RCC <br />ATTACHED ESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE ITY OUNCILWITH THE <br />: <br />FOLLOWING CONDITION <br /> <br /> <br />1.The current shed be moved to meet the R-1 setback requirements. <br /> <br />Baker stated that in the staff recommendation it states a thirteen foot setback and it <br />should state a twenty-nine foot setback. <br /> <br />6 Ayes, 0 Nays.MOTION APPROVED. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Public Hearings: NC06-02 and VN06-04 Type 4 Non-Conforming Use Permit <br />recognizing side yard setback not meeting the requirements and a variance to allow <br />an addition in the front yard setback. <br /> <br />The subject site has a single-family home that encroaches into the side yard setback at 3.6 <br />feet where 5 feet is required. The owner wishes to construct an addition to the house and <br />garage that would encroach into the front yard setback at 17.2 feet where 30 feet is <br />required. The proposed garage Staff believes issuance of a Type-4 Non-Conforming Use <br />Permit and Variance is appropriate because the impact of the non-conformity appears to <br />the minimal on the surrounding properties. It appears the addition will likely enhance the <br />home and will not have a detrimental appearance upon adjacent properties or the <br />neighborhood in general. <br /> <br />Doug Isiminger, homeowner, stated that if there was another location to put the attached <br />garage they would, however this lot is very narrow with no other site to place it. Hans <br />Rosacker, lives to the north of this property, has no objection to the addition of this <br />garage, and hopes the Commission will approve the application. <br /> <br />CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. <br />Motion by Baker, Second by Schiferl to <br /> <br />6 Ayes, 0 Nays,MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br /> <br />Schiferl inquired if staff had heard from the residents to the south of the property. <br />Fernelius replied that staff did not hear from the neighbors to the south of this property. <br />Baker stated that they have approved several applications that are similar to this on lake <br />lots, due to the older homes, smaller lots and there are a number of properties that do not <br />meet the front yard set back. <br /> <br /> W <br />Motion by Zisla, Second by Mann to <br />AIVE THE READING AND ADOPT THE ATTACHED <br />RCC. <br />ESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE ITY OUNCIL <br /> <br />6 Ayes, 0 Nays. MOTION APPROVED. <br /> <br />I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\Minutes\2006\09-19-2006.docPage 2 of 7 <br /> <br />