Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Approved <br />Greg Massie, Cement Masons Business Representative located at 2180 Old Hwy 8 <br />directly adjacent to Belair, stated that they have been neighbors with Belair since 1999 <br />and the applicants have been excellent neighbors and his company hardly notices that <br />there is a crushing operation going on next door. The applicants also clean the streets <br />twice a day. While there is quite a bit of truck traffic there are speed bumps installed and <br />the traffic has never been an issue. Belair and Midwest have great reputations in the <br />industry and he would support the application and believes it would be good for the City. <br /> <br />Eric Chambers, co-owner of the Fed-Tec building due north of the production facilities, <br />stated that there are four different business in the building and over one hundred <br />employees through out his building. Historically, Belair has had bad dust problems that <br />his company has complained about and while recently the dust has gotten better it is still <br />an issue. Because, Belair is located on an open plain area, in the spring and summer the <br />wind picks up the dust and carries it over to his building and as a result they have to <br />regular clean product before it is shipped out to make it look better. They would <br />appreciate any efforts to make the dust situation better. The proposed asphalt plant’s <br />steam plume will be an issue, when the winds blow just right the plume will go into his <br />building. He has two employees that have very bad reactions to petroleum smells, which <br />the asphalt plant emits; they may have to leave for the day. He is also concerned that if <br />the building smells of asphalt they may have a hard time retaining and getting employees. <br />He remains concerned about the dust, odors, and steam plumes that may get into the <br />building. They were also not asked to sign the petition and reiterated that Shelly Bitran <br />was not clear on what she was signing. <br /> <br />Brian Scholberg, Dymax, asked how many acres make up the site. Stiengline replied that <br />the site has nineteen acres. He asked if Midwest Asphalt would be a tenant or a joint <br />owner of the site. Steingline replied that Belair is currently using only thirty percent of <br />the site, which is a landfill, and there is nothing else that can be put on the site. He added <br />that they are prepared to spend quite a bit of money to increase the value of the property <br />and bring in jobs to the area. Scholberg inquired if the City needs Midwest Asphalt to <br />move and how the site was selected. Steingline replied that he does know that there have <br />been studies done that showed that by having an asphalt plant in the community has <br />saved the City money. However, this application is not tied to Midwest Asphalt moving <br />off of their site. Scholberg asked if the cement and concrete are new additions to the <br />plant, he does not remember seeing those proposals in any write-ups. Steingline replied <br />that there has always been mention of an asphalt and concrete production. Scholberg <br />inquired if there will be there is a new rail spur since it is on the drawing or does the rail <br />spur already exist. Steingline replied that it is a proposed rail spur. Scholberg stated that <br />he was led to believe that a rail was going to be proposed to go thru the property up to <br />Tyson property in Mounds View and would like to know if it is still part of the <br />development plan. Speckter replied that it is not part of the proposed plan before the <br />Commission this evening, but remains on the drawings to acknowledge that the rail <br />expansion has been discussed. Scholberg stated that the dust is his main concern and he <br />is also concerned about the proposed silo and the steam plume with how close it is to the <br />building. And if the fumes blow straight into the building, he is concerned how is will <br />affect his business. <br />I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\Minutes\2006\10-17-2006.docPage 5 of 9 <br /> <br />