Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Approved <br />replied that an addition kept on its own property it would not trigger park dedication. <br />Zisla stated he feels that is not fair, since an addition could have more of an impact on the <br />parks than redevelopment such as this. Mann stated that she is uncomfortable with the <br />statement “the amount to be determined,” because it could lead to inconsistency. Baker <br />stated the Commission needs to abide by the ordinance and the Council will make the <br />final decision. <br /> <br />SR <br />Motion by Baker, second by O’Brien to <br />APPROVE TAFF ECOMMENDATIONS AS <br />. <br />WRITTEN <br /> <br />Motion by Zisla, second by O’Brien to <br />AMEND THE PARK DEDICATION <br />PC <br />RECOMMENDATION TO SAY THAT THE LANNING OMMISSION RECOMMENDS WAIVING <br />. <br /> <br />THE PARK DEDICATION FEE <br /> <br />Schiferl stated that there is a plausible argument that potential employees could have an <br />impact on the parks, which means that there is an argument for some park dedication fee. <br />He also suggested that the Commission make a separate motion for the Council to review <br />and set standards for the ordinance. O’Keefe stated that he agrees that this is a larger <br />issue and should be addressed by the Council. Howard stated that the Council will either <br />make a decision or will realize that the ordinance needs a set of standards. He <br />recommends putting it forward to the Council as is and let the Council make that <br />decision. Baker stated that the Council will most likely have the same discussion as the <br />Commission is having, but it does create a hardship on the developer to not know what <br />his costs will be. <br /> <br />. <br />3 ayes, 4 nays <br />MOTION FAILED <br /> <br />SR <br />Motion by O’Keefe, second by Schiferl to <br />APPROVE TAFF ECOMMENDATIONS WITH <br />: <br />THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS <br /> <br />1)Removal of the single family home and all accessory buildings at 2023 Old <br />Highway 8 NW by May 1, 2008 and submission of a Letter of Credit in the <br />amount of $10,000 prior to Council review of the final plat. <br /> <br />2)The Planning Commission find the construction of 35w left remnants odd shaped <br />industrial lots providing a hardship. <br /> <br />MC <br />7 ayes, 0 nays . <br />OTION ARRIED <br /> <br /> <br />Public Hearing: VA2007-001 Partial Vacation of Mounds Avenue <br /> <br />The City is proposing a partial vacation of Mounds Avenue whereby the City would <br />extinguish the public roadway but retain its ability to maintain existing utilities. Mounds <br />Avenue consists of a 60’ platted public roadway containing water and sanitary sewer <br />utilities. <br /> <br />I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\Minutes\2007\02-20-2007.docPage 5 of 7 <br /> <br />