5-01-2007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Approved ordinance to impose a sixty-foot setback if the Commission feels that it is necessary. Baker added that when Brighton Village was first developed the project was one large building; the new development is several smaller buildings which mean pushing the buildings out to the setbacks. A sixty-foot set back would be wasted space. Nancy Grant, 1100 Robin Court, asked if there was a way to write a variance into this rather than “scraping” the whole sixty-foot setback. Baker replied that staff feels, and he agrees, that is the current standard of 60’ is excessive and should be dealt with now, in the form of a code amendment, rather than with the next development. CPH. Motion by Zisla, Second by O’Brien to LOSE THE UBLIC EARING MC. 5 ayes, 0 nays. OTION ARRIED AZA2007-002 Motion by O’Brien, second by Howard to PPROVE RECOMMEND ADOPTION OF THE ATTACHED CZCS7-230(8)PUD ORDINANCE DELETING ITEM OF ONING ODE ECTION OF THE LANNED NIT EVELOPMENT O. RDINANCE MC. 5 ayes, 0 nays. OTION ARRIED Public Hearing: PUD2007-002, LP2007-002, SP2007-002 Redevelopment of Brighton Village with a 43,000 s.f. LA Fitness Center & 25,400 s.f. of Retail Uses. The applicant is requesting a Planned Unit Development (PUD), Site Plan Review, and Special Use Permit in order to develop two retail buildings and a fitness center on the property known as Brighton Village (2303 Palmer Drive). The proposal includes 25,400 s.f. of retail in two buildings, a 43,000 s.f. fitness center, a drive- thru, 495 surface parking stalls, and related monument/pylon and wall style signage. The land use actions proposed allow for the following: ? Planned Unit Development: allows the applicant to develop more than one building on a single lot with shared parking and access arrangements, decreased building and parking setbacks, and increased building height. ? Site Plan Review: required for any new retail construction, and ? Special Use Permit: allows establishment of a Comprehensive Sign Plan. A number of Site Plans and PUD’s have been reviewed for Brighton Village over the last several years. All plans have become null and void as they were not acted on within 6 months of approval. Also, the old retail facility was demolished over a year ago and the debris has been removed from the site. This property is zoned B-3, General Business which is the cities most intensive retail district in terms of uses permitted and site development standards. O’Brien inquired to the reason for a seven foot fence. Gundlach replied that she does not know why the applicant chose seven feet; it might have been because that was the height of the previous fence. However, the code states that fences cannot be taller than six feet. Mike Korsch, Kraus Anderson, replied that they would be fine with a six-foot fence. I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\Minutes\2007\5-01-2007.docPage 2 of 8