CCP 07-24-2007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Approved att Wiestling, Finn Daniels, stated that as the design progressed after receiving the approval in April it was discovered that some of the portions of the building were off slightly and to keep with in the intent of the design the building was slightly increased in size. They added 8 inches to the length and four feet eight inches to the width, which multiplied by three floors comes to 3600 square feet. Larger restrooms and locker rooms were added to the exercise room and the common rooms on each floor were increased in size. Baker asked how many stalls were included with the proof of parking.. Gundlach replied that eighteen stalls were provided and if the proof of parking were to be implemented it will impact the landscape plan; some of the. larger islands would be eliminated and mature landscaping would be lost in four different islands. Zisla asked for a clarification on the calculation of parking and how is it applied to a larger building. Gundlach replied that it is applied just at it is for a smaller building; gross square footage, remove ten percent, and then apply one stall per 200 square feet. She added that there is not another mechanism in the code to calculate parking. Schiferl questioned if the applicant should move out, would a new owner have to come before the commission. Gundlach replied that a new owner would not have to come before the Commission as long as they comply with the declaration. Schiferl asked what would happen if a new user needs more parking. Gundlach replied that the City could use the proof of parking to make the owner build the eighteen stalls if future use shows that additional parking is needed. O'Brien stated that the applicant could build a parking deck. Gundlach replied that would be an option. Motion by Baker, second by O'Brien to CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. yes, 0 nays. MOTION CARRIED. Schiferl stated that he is uncomfortable with the proposal since there is such a large parking shortage. Baker stated that the parking load will not be impacted with the increase of square footage, since it is being applied to the common areas. Motion by O'Brien, second by Baker to APPROVE PUD2007-004 AMENDMENT TO PUD2007-003. 6 ayes, 0 nays. MOTION CARRIED. Public Hearing: PUD2007-005 Amendment to Approved Planned Unit Development PUD2006-002 The applicants are requesting an amendment to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) that was approved on August 22, 2006 (Resolution 06-085) for the development known as Long Lake Landing within the Northwest Quadrant. The applicants PUD amendment request specifically relates to Tract 1 of the development only. The Commission may recall that the applicants gained final overall PUD approval for the entire west side of Old Highway 8 NW in August of 2006. Following that approval several of the following events occurred that ultimately meant the previously approved Site Plan needed to be modified: City closing on the remaining Midwest Asphalt site allowing full access to the property, geotechnical problems were discovered that made development on the northern approximately 8 acres cost-prohibitive, and the local housing market, and most importantly the condo market, slowed severely. Staff and the applicants have been working through these issues since early January. The City Council has also held two work sessions to review the changing conditions. After many meetings and many site plan iterations Page 5 of 9