Laserfiche WebLink
City of New Brighton <br />July 10, 1979 <br /> <br />on PL-118 until a preliminary plat showing the proposed <br />changes has been presented and considered. <br />1 aye - 4 nayes (Senden, Janecek, Benke, Blomquist) - motion failed <br />Vote on main motion. <br />4 ayes - 1 naye (Werdouschegg) <br />The City Planner reviewed the staff report. NC-41, LP-93 <br />11:55 - 12:05 <br />Paul Williams, representing Northwestern Report No. 79-433 <br />Bell was present to answer questions. <br />Motion by Benke, seconded by Blomquist to close <br />the hearing. <br />5 ayes 0 nayes motion carried <br />Motion by Blomquist, seconded by Janecek to waive the <br />reading and adopt a RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT RESOLUTION <br />AND APPROVING APPLICATION FOR NON-CONFORMING USE PERMIT, NO. 2227 <br />NC-41. <br />Motion by Benke, seconded by Senden to delete under the <br />BE IT FUTHER RESOLVED item number 1 and to renumber <br />item number 2. <br />1 <br />Motion by Werdouschegg, seconded by Janecek to add an <br />item number 2 under the BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED to read <br />as follows: <br />2. That the applicant provide screening in a means other <br />than slating the existing chain link fence to provide <br />the necessary screening of outside storage along the <br />boundaries of the property. <br />4 ayes - 1 naye (Benke) - motion carried <br /> <br />Vote on main motion as amended. <br />5 ayes - 0 nayes - motion carried <br />Motion by Blomquist, seconded by Benke to approve LP-93 <br />subject to compliance with the conditions of NC-41 and <br />conformance to the site and landscape.plans dated July <br />10, 1979 and signed by the applicant and the City Planner. <br />5 ayes 0 nayes - motion carried <br />Wayne German, representing Riviera Homes, PRD #29, PL-119 <br />Larry Swick, representing Real Estate. 12:05 - 12:12 <br />10 and-Lars Lidberg, representing Windsor - Report No. 79-441 <br />Green Association were present to answer <br />questions. <br />Councilman Werdouschegg questioned why the <br />four units on the northern corner of the property <br />could not be moved to the south to allow more space <br />between the units and the street. <br />-6