Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />The bankers that were asked were also of the opinion that there <br />was value in assurances from the HRA that a certain parcel was not <br />to be acquired or a certain business or home was not to be removed. <br />As one banker noted, a principal concern of a lending institution is <br />the certainty it can have regarding the conditions affecting the property ' <br />on which it is making the laon. The elements of the redevelopment plan <br />and the HRA assurances as to its plans can reduce any uncertainties <br />that may exist for properties that are not proposed to be acquired. <br />In this regard, properties in the "possibly to be acquired" category <br />will also be subject to some uncertainties, and therefore, may face <br />some restrictions on financing. On this point, however, I was unable <br />to obtain any real information. <br />LA <br />March 24, 1977 <br />TO`: The Honorable Chairman & Commissioners of the New Brighton <br />Housing and Redevelopment Authority <br />FROM: Barry P. Johnson, Executive Director <br />RE: Impact of Inclusion in Redevelopment Area <br />At its last regular meeting, the Commissioners directed that <br />I research the effect of inclusion in the redevelopment area on the <br />ability of a property onwer to obtain commercial financing. We <br />contacted Northwestern National Bank, Minnesota Federal, Home Federal, <br />1st Minnehaha, Twin City Federal and lst State Bank of New Brighton, <br />as well as, the Hopkins, South St. Paul and Minneapolis HRA's. All <br />information was received over the telephone. <br />The general consensus, agreed to by all parties contacted, was <br />that inclusion in the redevelopment district, per sp, had no effect <br />on ability to obtain financing. Three of the banks and savings and loans <br />indicated they have made loans in redevelopment areas. <br />While some persons asserted that there were no problems at all <br />in obtaining financing, at least three of the persons contacted <br />felt that being designated for acquisition and clearance would affect <br />the terms under which financing could be obtained. It was felt that <br />these properties would be less attractive for financing and that <br />the term of loans would be shorter, while the amount of loan that <br />would be approved would be less. It was felt that home improvement <br />loans for property to be acquired would be very difficult to obtain. <br />This seemed to be especially true for residential property. For <br />businesses, decisions on financing were made primarily on the financial <br />strength of the business. <br />