Laserfiche WebLink
-February 22, 1977 <br />TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the Council <br />FROM: Thomas F. Lewcock, City Manager <br />SUBJECT: Capital Improvement Plan Scheduling <br />The general revenue sharing requirements have now been finalized. <br />After studying the requirements it would appear that we have no <br />choice but to consider the capital improvement budget with the annual <br />operating budget. Since the regulations took effect on January 1, <br />there is no impact on the 1977 Capital Budget. <br />The prime concern we have registered in combining the operating budget <br />and capital plan is that both documents require substantial preparatory <br />time. To prepare both documents at the same time would overload both <br />staff and secretarial personnel. This is not to say there would not <br />be some definite advantages. First the operating costs of capital <br />improvement could be better assessed by both the Council and the <br />administration. Secondly, with the advent of the road reconstruction <br />program utilizing ad valorum taxes, the specific effect of this program on <br />the overall tax rate can be better assessed. <br />We believe there is a way of meeting the federal requirements and <br />receiving the above benefits while at the same time not having a major <br />impact on staff resources. A one year capital budget could be included <br />in the operating budget. This one year budget would essentially <br />reflect the second year of the five year C.I.P. with whatever amendments <br />are warranted based upon review of project scope and cost. Where <br />necessary, individual program memoranda would be prepared. The complete <br />five year plan would be prepared and submitted to the Council later for <br />review and approval based upon the current C.I.P. scheduling. This <br />would permit the time for indepth committee and staff study as is <br />currently the case. Should it become necessary', amendments to the one <br />year budget could be made at this time. The only problem with such <br />amendments would be in the revenue sharing -area where substantial <br />changes in the use of revenue sharing:'should not occur. This problem can <br />be easily avoided by using those funds for projects which are relatively <br />certain to occur. <br />If the Council agrees with the above method of budgeting for the C.I.P., <br />we would request a motion so <br />the currents accordingly. <br />Thomas F. Lewcock <br />City Manager <br />stating and we would proceed with preparing <br />