Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />Council Proceedings <br />City of New Brighton <br />March 22, 1977 <br />Council Business NC -16 <br />Mayor Bromander directed, with consent of the Council, Gonella <br />that memorandum from Environmental Quality Commission <br />dated March 15, 1977 Re: Expansion of abandoned Texaco <br />station at Rush Lake be received and placed in the minutes <br />Motion by Senden, seconded by Hardt to amend resolution by <br />changing Item 4(b) and 6 urd er the first THEREFORE BE IT <br />RESOLVED by adding words "or building" after the word <br />"canopy"and to waive the reading of resolution and to adopt <br />resolution entitled RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT <br />AND APPROVING APPLICATION FOR NC -16 As amended. <br />5 ayes - 0 nayes - carried <br />Motion by Fisher, seconded by Hardt to authorize <br />administrative authority to issue building permit to <br />Wayne Gonella. <br />5 ayes- 0 nayes- carried <br />Mayor Bromand:er directed, with consent of the Council <br />that memorandum from Environmental Quality Commission <br />dated March 15, 1977 Re, Large Animal Ordinance be <br />received and placed in the minutes <br />Motion by Werdouschegg, seconded by Senden to waive <br />reading of ordinance and to hold second reading, adoption <br />and publication of an ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 660:25, <br />OF THE 1966 CODE OF ORDINANCES RELATING TO LARGE ANIMAL <br />REGISTRATION FEES AND HEALTH CERTIFICATES <br />5 ayes- 0 nayes- carried <br />I <br />RESOLUTION <br />NO. 1857 <br />Building <br />Permit <br />Gonella. <br />ORDINANCE <br />No. 387 <br />SUBD.1 <br />Mayor Bromander directed, with consent of the Council, that <br />letter and resolutions from New Brighton Jaycees dated <br />March 7, 1977 be received and placed in the minutes. <br />Letter -Jaycee <br />Robert Benke,., chairman New Brighton Jaycees, reviewed Smoke Decters <br />the letter and resolutions providing the Council with the Ordinance <br />Jaycees' thoughts on these subjects. <br />Mayor Bromander questioned whether a mandatary smoke <br />detector ordinance was constitutional and how it would Adm. prepare <br />be enforced. Report <br />Mr. Benke stated Hibbing and Minneapolis had adopted such <br />ordinance and the question of enforcement <br />could be looked at by a study committee. <br />Motion by Senden, seconded by Hardt to direct administration <br />to prepare report regarding a mandatory smoke detector ordinance <br />for dwelling units <br />5 ayes - 0 nayes- carried <br />