1976-12-28 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Council Proceedings 2k City of New Brighton Dec. 28, 1976 Mr. Skiba responded that he had similar concerns; however, he had waited for some time for a decision as to whether plans for the street system would be altered and what the comprehensive plan for the area would call for. He stated that he did not wish to wait any longer for these decisions and therefore p referred to go ahead with the proposed plat. Al Logelin, 933 11th Avenue, questioned the zoning on the property. Maryor Bromander responded it was zoned as single family. Mr. Logelin stated he was in favor of the plat and variance as long as the property remained single family. Councilman Werdouschegg questioned what was contemplated for the area in the comprehensive plan and whether there was a slope to the west of the property. The Building and Planning Coordinator stated the comprehensive plan showed the area as single family and that there was a very steep slope on the western side of the property• 2. Motion by Fisher, seconded by Hardt to close hearing. Close 5 ayes- 0 nayes- carried Hearing Motion by Fisher, seconded by Werdouschegg to.waive reading of a resolution and to adopt resolution entitled RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING RESOLUTION APPLICATION FOR VN -166 such resolution to include the NO. 1815 A following findings of fact: 1. That theparcelis of such size that only three lots could be created meeting the minimum lot width of 75 feet; 2. That with a variance four lots with a lot width of 74'6" could be..created each lot having almost. double the city's minimum lot area requirement; 3. That a 74 foot 6" lot width is not significantly different from a 75 foot lot width; 4. That hardship would be created by not allowing four lots based -upon the above unique circumstances; 5. That no special privilege would accrue to the property in permitting four lots because of the oversized area.of the lots and small deviation in lot width. 5 ayes- 0 nayes -carried Councilman Werdouschegg inquired as to the property line on the;plat and as to;whether the south property line was, in fact, south of 8th Street.