My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1977-01-11
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
Minutes 1977
>
1977-01-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2019 10:10:39 AM
Creation date
10/31/2007 3:48:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
December 24, 1976 <br />TO: Members of the Council and <br />Members of the Planning Commission <br />FROM: Councilman Paul Hardt <br />SUBJECT: Variances <br />As a result of a conversation with the Planning Commission, and <br />much thinking during hearings on variances, I would like to offer some <br />observations and positions on the question of variances. While the <br />topic has been discussed extensively by one more experienced than <br />myself, some ideas have crystalized in my mind which I would like to <br />add to the debate. <br />The issue of granting a variance is clearly one of special <br />privilege weighed against the application of fair, objective criteria. <br />The idea of special privilege should be treated with respect, even in <br />micro -political situations such as in our city. The Founding Fathers <br />had been the victims of special privilege laws which prevented them from <br />being represented in Parliament, prevented the free flow of trade, and <br />abrogated important civil rights. The Founders wisely set up a system <br />which stated that all are equal under the law. This is a cornerstone <br />of our country, and when our system of government is compared to <br />others, it is one of the first and most striking differences which set <br />it apart and above the others. Even in our little way, we see this <br />principle of equality applied at our council table. What one citizen <br />wants, others demand. What we grant to one, must be granted to others. <br />We have even had citizens quote the constitution to us in the interest <br />of guaranteeing equality of treatment for garage sale signs and campaign <br />signs. Perhaps the Founders didn't envision pylon signs and setback <br />requirements as being issues in 1789, but, being small businessmen, <br />lawyers, doctors, laborers, they understood that each citizen, no <br />matter how lowly, must be treated fairly. <br />The city council is one of the few bodies in our governmental system <br />that is allowed to find exceptions to its own laws. We on the council <br />occupy the double role of legislator and judge. This double role has <br />its conflicts. We don't like to face those situations where we have to <br />admit that that beautiful law which we wrote a few months ago doesn't <br />work. And we sometimes are loath to enforce the law we write. On the <br />other hand, because we are one of the few governmental bodies which does <br />have to decide how the law applies in the hard situations, we have a <br />unique opportunity to get feedback ori the law from citizens,from the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.