My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1977-01-11
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
Minutes 1977
>
1977-01-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2019 10:10:39 AM
Creation date
10/31/2007 3:48:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br />Talking about fairness and equality is all well and good. Where <br />are the standards? They are in the law, and their meaning needs to be <br />defined. The conditions for variances are hardship, unique circumstances, <br />and in the case of signs, and as implied in the other variance procedures, <br />no special privilege is granted through the granting of the variance. <br />These terms need to be defined. <br />Hardship must mean hardship caused by the land, building, topography, <br />location, or other circumstances applying to the property. The law is <br />a land law, and it does not refer in any way to money, economics, <br />business, developers, price per acre or other considerations. In <br />essence the law says, "Regardless of money, the problem with this land is <br />" This is the only objective criteria that can be applied. <br />An economic criteria allows the council to grant special privilege to <br />some, and keep others under the law. It allows the council to pick and <br />choose on the basis of whether the council, or a particular councilman <br />likes the applicants, has been influenced by the applicant, or likes <br />his occupation. <br />The economic criteria of hardship can't be considered because what <br />is economic hardship? Who can determine it? With our changing business <br />situations what is a hardship today may be a bonanza tomorrow, or vice <br />versa. How much hardship is economic hardship? You can't draw the line <br />with money. A few dollars, $50 dollars, $1000 dollars? Maybe $1000 is <br />a hardship to one business man, and is a drop in the bucket to another. <br />Who do you believe? Are there appraisers qualified to determine <br />economic hardship? I doubt it. Declaring economic hardship for one <br />and allowing him a variance may cause a hardship to another. What is <br />the council to say to the applicants who says "Because Joe's variance <br />allows him to put out a sign, and I'm not, he's got all my business. <br />This is a hardship. Give me a variance. <br />In contrast to these serious questions about economics, we can <br />easily determine hardship in terms of acreage or square footage of wall <br />space. We can measure this. All can agree as to whether a sign can be <br />allowed in an area with X number of feet, and if no sign can be allowed <br />on the building because of square footage requirements, then a hardship <br />exists. Just from a practical standpoint, we can enforce the law with <br />land or square footage requirements. We can't enforce the law with <br />economics. But more importantly, land and square footage requirements <br />ensure fairness to all. <br />Another criteria required by the law, besides hardship is that <br />unique circumstances must exist with the building or property. Unique <br />means "being without a like or equal; very rare, unusual; one and only." <br />The meaning is clear. We need not even consider the intent. The land must <br />have a one and only hill, unlike any other hill in the city; the property <br />must have a one and only ditch, or creek. Or, a building must have a one <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.