05-030 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, I I. .. 'I " " RESOLUTION No. 05-030 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND ApPROVING PRDOS-OI, LPOS-OI, and PL05-0 1 WHEREAS, an application has been made by Mr. Ted Redmond, ofBKV Group, on behalf of the Clifton House to be considered for a preliminary PRD review by the City Planning Commission. WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: I.An application for PRD, Site Plan, and Preliminary Plat was filed with the City of New Brighton on December 22,2004, 2.A Public Hearing Notice was published in the New Brighton Bulletin on January 4, 2005. 3.Public hearing notification was distributed to all property owners within 600 feet of the subject site. 4.The Planning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notices, held a public hearing on January 18, 200S and all persons present at the hearing were given an opportunity to be heard. S.The Planning Commission considered the plans and recommended preliminary review approval subject to conditions. 6.0n January 25, 2005, the City Council considered the application and tabled the application allowing the applicant to re-design the site plan. 7.0n April 26, 2005 the Council approved a preliminary PRD with conditions. WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following Findings of Fact in respect to PRDOS-Ol, LPOS-Ol, and PLOS-Ol: l.The site is zoned R-l. 2.Under a Planned Residential Development preliminary approval process, increased density, height limitations, and land uses are reviewed and considered. '3.The application has gone through the PRD Review Process and the Planning Commission has recommended the Preliminary Review to the City Council. 4.The proposed units for the PRD include 6 proposed convalescence units and three visitor/meditation units to treat the health and healing of Christian Science faith practitioners. 5.As specified in Section 8-130 of the New Brighton Zoning Ordinance, no special use shall be recommended by the Planning Commission unless such shall fmd: a. That the establishment, maintenance, or operations of the special use will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort of general public. b. That the special use will not be itliurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. . c. That the establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. 1:\COUNCIL\RESOLUTIONS\2005\Com Dev\PRD05-01_LP05-01_PL05-01.doc