My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-24-2008
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2008
>
CCP 06-24-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2018 11:20:29 PM
Creation date
6/20/2008 3:18:05 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
254
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Staff funds removal of the existing detached garage is not practical as it is in good repair <br />and matches the principal structure on the lot. Also, it has not been the practice of this <br />Commission or Council to deny these types of requests, so long as the proposed <br />improvements are in full compliance with current ordinances and the nonconforming <br />structure is in good repair. <br />Thus, staff finds these conditions to be met and would recommend approval of the <br />Nonconforming Use Permit. <br />SPECIAL USE PERMIT ANALYSIS <br />In addition to the nonconforming setback, the applicant would like to construct an addition to the <br />existing garage whereby its total square footage will exceed 624 square feet. Zoning Code <br />Section 4-530 (K) states that accessory buildings exceeding 624 square feet in size shall be <br />subject to approval of a Special use Permit under Section 8-110 through 8-130 and subject to <br />compliance with the following conditions (staff responses in italics): <br />1. Roof and exterior color and material must be consistent and complimentary with the <br />principal structure. <br />Stafffunds this criterion to be met. The applicant has stated in the attached narrative <br />and depicted on the proposed exterior elevations that the addition will match the <br />existing garage and existing home. <br />2. If deemed necessary by the City Council, landscape screening shall be provided to <br />lessen visual impact from adjacent properties. <br />Staff has not received any comments from adjacent properties and has no reason to <br />recommend requiring any landscape screening. The front of the garage faces inward <br />to the property rather than at the street. Additionally, being the large lot sizes of <br />adjacent properties but side yard setbacks less than 5, the activity within the garage <br />should not negatively impact those lots. <br />3. No commercial or home occupation activity shall be conducted within the accessory <br />building. <br />The applicant has been informed of this standard and has indicated compliance will <br />be met. Additionally, the attached narrative indicates the purpose of the garage <br />addition is storage. <br />In addition to the standards noted in Section 4-530 (K), Section 8-130 states that no special use <br />shall be recommended by the Planning Commission unless is shall find (staff responses in <br />italics): <br />a. That the establishment, maintenance, or operations of the special use will not be <br />detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort of the general <br />public. <br />• Staff funds this criterion to be met. As of the drafting of this report, staff has not <br />received any concerns/comments with regard to the proposal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.