Resolution 1823 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r . . .' -' .... ,- 3. That the hearing process has evidenced problems of access and surface waters as to PRD No. 21 and PRD No. 18~ ~. That the character of lands and ponds in the common area as approved as a part of PRD No. 18 are amenities to the common area which would be altered and disrupted by the proposed development~ 5. That PRD NO. 21 as proposed would require alterations t;o the common area of PRD NO. 18 which could not be applied for by the applicant of PRD No. 2l~ 6. That PRD NO. 21 is not harmonious with the approved PRD No. 18 (PL-89) in that substandard lots are proposed: 7. That there is no showing of any compelling public benefit in approving PRD NO. 21. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That based on the above Findings of Fact, the application for PRD NO. 21 be and is hereby denied BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the New Br;ghton City Council makes the following findings of fact in respect to the applica- tion for the fill permit related to PIID No. 21 Findinq of Fact 1. That the filling includes filling of lands in PRD No. 21 and common areas of PRD NO. 18 (PL-89) ~ 2. That filling of common area in PRD NO. 18 could hot i' be applied for by the applicant of PRD No. 21i I 3. That although the proposed filling would somewhat resolve the problem of access to the common area of PRD No. 18, it would negatively affect the amenities of PRD No. 18 common area and would clB nge the zoning conditions established as part of PRD NO. 18. BE IT FURTUER RESOLVED, That based on, the above Findings of Fa(Jt the application 'for the fill permit relat~d to PRD No. 21 be and is hereby denied. Adopted this 28th'dayof December, 1976. ~A ~' ATTEST: ~, ~.- ~ Ga Bromander, Mayor .. ~?~cL ~~ 1':i20~ homas F. Lewcock, Manager , Vernon C. Pederson, Clerk-Treasurer i' ,( SEAL)