My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 2033
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Resolutions
>
Resolutions 1978
>
Resolution 2033
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2008 7:46:08 AM
Creation date
6/25/2008 8:20:42 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />, ,.. , <br />. -.. RESOLUTION NO. 2033 <br />f" <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br /> CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON <br /> RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING NON-CONFORMING <br /> USE PERMIT NC-29 <br /> WHEREAS, an application for a non-conforming use permit <br /> NC-29 has been made by John D. Robinson to permit the expansion <br /> and re-use of a building located at 2123 Old Highway #8, and <br /> WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as <br /> follows: <br /> 1. That an application for non-conforming use permit <br /> NC-29 was filed with the City on March 15, 1978. <br /> 2. That the Board of Review heard and reviewed the <br /> application at its meeting of March 21, 1978. <br /> 3. That the City Council, pursuant to published and <br /> mailed notices, held .a public hearing on April 11, <br /> 1978, to consider the application. A 11 persons <br /> present at the hearing were given an opportunity to <br /> be heard. <br /> 4. The written comments and analysis of the City Planner, <br /> the Planning Commission minutes and recommendations <br /> and all person's statements made at the public <br /> hearing were considered. <br /> NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of <br /> New Brighton that the following findings of fact are made in <br /> respect to NC-29: <br /> 1. That the following Type IV non-conformities exist on <br /> the property: <br /> A. There is no concrete curbing along the driveways <br /> in the front yard. <br /> B. The front yard is used for parking which is not <br /> permitted in an industrial district. <br /> C. The entire front yard is not landscaped. <br /> D. The side yard setbacks for the residential units <br /> are less than the required 15 feet. <br /> E. Vehicular doors facing the street are less than <br /> fifty (50 ) feet from the public right-of-way. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.