Laserfiche WebLink
Approved <br />0 6 ayes, 0 nays. MOTION APPROVED. <br />Schiferl asked the applicant why they feel the co -locatable abilities of this tower will not <br />be used. Truman replied that the other major carriers already have several locations in <br />the area. <br />Motion by O'Brien, second by Schiferl, to RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE SPECIAL <br />USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDI'T'IONS: <br />I. The applicant submits revised drawings showing the revised location being <br />approximately 100' further to the south and 10' from the easterly lot line at the <br />time of building permit submittal. <br />2. All ground equipment meets a 10' setback from the easterly lot line with the <br />exception being the fence. <br />3. City Council adoption of the proposed code amendment allowing for a 10' tower <br />setback to the easterly lot line, that being I -35W. <br />6 ayes, 0 nays. MOTION APPROVED. <br />Adjournment: 9:33 PM <br />I—] <br />Janice Gundlach, City Planner <br />