CCP 11-10-2008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• 18, Block 2, MARY'S RICE CREEK DIVISION, Ramsey County, Minnesota, Except East 10 feet of said Lot 18; Wt 19, Block 2, MARY'S RICE CREEK DIVISION, Ramsey County, Minnesota, Subject t l Road. 4. 1,te Planning Commission and City Council considered the Site Plan in accordance with the sines district standards of Section 5-150, the commercial performance standards of Sl ction 6-390, and the parking standards of Chapter 11 of the Zoning Code. 5.)�e Planning Commission and Council found all applicable Site Plan standards to be met. 6. 1l e Planning Commission and Council reviewed the proposal in accordance with the lowing Special Use Permit conditions of Section 8-130: That the establishment, maintenance, or operations of the special use will not be TS\2008\Community Development\5-13-2008\LP2008-002, SP2008-006, SP2008-007 (Momentum Design Group) - 2 detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare. b. That the special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. c That the establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been or are being provided. e That the special use shall in all other respects conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. 7. 1 lie Planning Commission and Council found the proposal to meet the findings of Section 8- 13 0, subject to conditions. 8. Planning Commission and Council considered the Special Use Permit for a reduced side s1:et yard parking setback in accordance with Section 11-020 (6) (*). 9. he Planning Commission and Council determined the criteria of Section 11-020 (6) (*) weTe met as the setback is existing and no further encroachment is proposed. 10. he Planning Commission reviewed the proposal in accordance with the following Special Lr e standards for drive-thru facilities: a The drive-thru facility does not negatively impact traffic on public rights-of-way. A stacking lane shall be provided with a minimum of four spaces per lane in addition to the number of required parking spaces. c The stacking lane shall be a minimum of twelve feet wide. The vehicle stacking lane shall not extend beyond the street right-of-way line. e The vehicle stacking lane shall be delineated so that vehicles waiting in line will not unreasonably interfere with the primary driving, entrance, exit, and parking facilities on site. Employee -only designated parking may be considered in an effort to comply with this condition. f Any pedestrian walkway that is adjacent to or crosses the stacking lane must be marked and clearly indicated with signage or painted crosswalk. The drive-thru use may be limited so as not to unreasonably interfere with adjacent and nearby uses. Limits of use may include, but is not limited to, prohibition of certain uses that may be inappropriate due to their demand on parking and stacking needs, such as fast food establishments. TS\2008\Community Development\5-13-2008\LP2008-002, SP2008-006, SP2008-007 (Momentum Design Group) - 2