My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-17-2009 WORK SESSION
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
WORK SESSION
>
02-17-2009 WORK SESSION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2021 6:31:14 PM
Creation date
2/11/2009 3:52:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BUDGET <br /> POTENTIAL EXPLANATION CURRENT PROBLEMS / ISSUES POLICY CHANGES IMPLICATIONS TIMEFRAME STAKEHOLDERS <br /> AMENDMENT(in bold) (beyond typical staff/city <br /> attorney collaboration) <br /> Site Plan section: trigger Interior remodels do not trigger Inadequate parking becomes problematic over PC & CC would consider Site 45-60 days + <br /> Mailing to commercial / Commercial/industrial <br /> for interior remodel Site Plan reviews. Depending on time if interior remodels occur with drastic Plans for interior remodels— industrial building depending on building owners—mainly <br /> impacting 10% of floor area remodel, land use implications parking implications (i.e. warehouse main issue would be determining public <br /> owners. multi-tenant buildings. <br /> (%up for discussion) inadvertently result. converted to office). if adequate parking is available. sentiment <br /> Many industrial properties have grandfather Regulatory process wouldn't Mailing to industrial <br /> rights with regard to outdoor storage—this property owners. <br /> change(SUP)—amendment <br /> Provide better conditions under has resulted in virtually no regulation for 6 months— 1 <br /> which outdoor storage may exist, existing industrial properties with outdoor would have to clarify if existing Additional City Attorney year+ <br /> Outdoor storage standards such as allowable amounts, storage. properties are impacted. advisement RE who is depending on Industrial property& <br /> locations, screening, pavement, impacted with the public business owners. <br /> drainage, etc. Better defined conditions would give a new If existing properties must amendment—how to sentiment <br /> applicant better assurances in requesting this comply a compliance program establish a compliance <br /> use. would have to be implemented. program. <br /> Provide a list of expected <br /> standards such as setbacks, Regulatory process and None <br /> screening,parking, exterior Currently staff directs potential applicants to standards wouldn't change. 2-6 months+ Business owners with <br /> building materials, etc. —actual numerous sections of the code—amendment depending on <br /> Outdoor dining standards Additional City Attorney public outdoor dining areas <br /> standards imposed wouldn't would allow less guidance with regard to Examine how to handle existing time if Jake's would be existing or planned. <br /> change-merely be consolidated expectations. outdoor dining areas that don't impacted. sentiment <br /> in the SUP section of the have a SUP (Jake's). <br /> ordinance. <br /> The existing performance Lack of landscaping standards,unusable 3-6 months + <br /> sound standards, exterior materials not ideal. No policy changes—better Commercial/industrial <br /> Performance Standards of standards applicable toPotential additional City depending on <br /> These issues create some uncertainty at the defined standards to examine as property&business <br /> Section 6-390 commercial &industrial site planning stage in terms of what will be part of the site plan process. Attorney time. public owners. <br /> property are generally outdated. expected for approval. sentiment <br /> Consider requiring at least one <br /> enclosed parking stall for single Conversion of garage space to living space. <br /> family residential. Results in more vehicles, garbage cans, etc. Single family homes with <br /> Parking Standards of being stored outside. None—issue would be reviewed None 45-60 days no enclosed parking <br /> Section 11-030 (3) Provide legislative mechanism during the site planning process. spaces (staff is aware of <br /> (other than a variance) to allow Desire to allow less parking without requiring at least 2). <br /> less parking than required by a variance(usually a hardship isn't present). <br /> code - . - <br /> The current ordinances do not address None. This amendment would <br /> PRD/PUD Amendment Provide standards and amendments, only phased developments. Existing PUD &PRD <br /> provide for a defined set of None 45-60 days developments. <br /> procedures procedures for amendments. This becomes problematic—most recent procedures & standards. <br /> p <br /> example is the Clifton House sign request. <br /> 1. Clarify when to plat vs. minor Inconsistent treatment of applicants. Clarification would result in <br /> Subdivision Ordinance: subdivide. better record keeping(clearer Potential additional City Varies—probably limited <br /> minor subdivisions &lot Lot combinations that result in building over legal descriptions) and less Attorney time. 45-60 days interest. <br /> combinations 2. Allowing lot combinations. lot lines. confusion of land ownership. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.