Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of New Brighton <br />February 24, 1981 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Public Hearings <br />The Mayor with the consent of the Council <br />directed receipt of a letter from Belair <br />Builders dated February 17, 1981 which <br />requested withdrawal of their application <br />for variance. <br /> <br />VN-215, LP-105 <br />Belair Builders <br />7:40-7:42 <br /> <br />With concurrence of the Council that <br />their request should be honored, no further <br />action was taken by the Council. <br /> <br />The Director of Public Works described the <br />storm sewer project. <br /> <br />Improvement #78-7 <br />Storm Sewer - <br />Old Highway #8 <br />Project <br />Report No. 81-27 <br />7:43-7:55 <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2425 <br /> <br />Mr. Dick Aplikowskil owner of Lakeside <br />Mobile Horne Park and affected property <br />owner spoke in favor of the improvement. <br /> <br />Mr. Don Ericksonl 1297 Imperial Lanel <br />requested Council consider MSA 116B <br />before making a decision. <br /> <br />No one else spoke to the subject. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Motion by Janecek, seconded by Blomquist <br />to close the hearing. <br />S ayes - 0 nayes - motion carried <br /> <br />Motion by Benkel seconded by Schmidt to <br />waive the reading and adopt a RESOLUTION <br />APPROVING THE RAMSEY COUNTY PLAN FOR THE <br />UPGRADING OF OLD HIGHWAY #8 BETWEEN 2ND <br />STREET NW AND 6TH STREET SW AND APPROVING <br />THE SPECIAL ASSESSING OF THE UNFUNDED <br />POR1'ION OF THE STORM SEWER COST AGAINST <br />THE BENEFITTING PROPERTIES WITHIN THE <br />DRAINAGE AREA. <br />5 ayes - 0 nayes - motion carried <br /> <br />The Director of Public Works described <br />the proposed project. <br /> <br />Improvement #81-2 <br />Foss Road Storm <br />Sewer <br />Report No. 81-28 <br />7:55-8:37 <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2426 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Dan Ha1va, attorney representing <br />Dick Aplikowskil spoke to the subject. <br />He suggested the project be done in <br />conjunction with tpe Highway #8 project <br />and stated that although the costs are <br />highl that if the project was done in <br />conjunction with the Highway #8 project <br />the cost would be less than if done at <br />a future date. <br /> <br />-2- <br />