|
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />.,", </:1 i'.'."~ .,., ,t,;':~''''j''~:~'':..;
<br />
<br />., ",." .1:'1'I".Ii'~lIq~II~II'~~!I'''''~'lit~''il'~lt'llI~~~:~''A'~.'I~ 1,1i1\,,~~~'~llr~i,1J'~;/,:ll;.t"1~(II!W'i"t~'\"F':i'!;i~I:W'~'I~~Il'~~lIf"i.i~i';,\~~~I~I~~fY'~...~"""" .... I..,., ".~ ....
<br />!' ,. .,:' .,'.','.'t", ." ". ; .,., "1 ",!Wf' ,. ...../_ ,; .," f'''-,,)"'''1 ,., "":: ,;W' "~':': .', 1'" ",,' ';: : ''''''Ii: .. If,' "~ ' "', .',. ",
<br />. ,
<br />
<br />City of New Brighton
<br />February l2, 1980
<br />
<br />Public Hearings
<br />The Mayor directed receipt and read a letter
<br />from the applicant requesting the continuation
<br />of consideration for the PRD until the next
<br />Council meeting so that the applicant has
<br />sufficient time to prepare the necessary
<br />plans.
<br />
<br />The Director of Community Development reviewed
<br />the development proposal and noted that the
<br />plans had been approved by both the Planning
<br />Commission and Park Board.
<br />
<br />Wayne Leverkuhn, Chair of the New Brighton Planning
<br />Commission, stated that there had appeared to be
<br />a great deal of support for the plans now prepared
<br />by the geveloper.
<br />
<br />Mr. Leverkuhn stated that it should be well noted
<br />that reconstruction of the tennis court and other
<br />landscaping should be the responsibility of the
<br />developer.
<br />
<br />PRD #30
<br />PL-12l - Cadwalladel
<br />7:35 - 7:45
<br />
<br />Mr. Lyle Studt, 77 Oakwood Drive, area resident for
<br />16 years stated that he had been fOllowing this project
<br />through the various Planning Comnlission and Park Board
<br />meetings and that his main concern has been to retain
<br />access to Oakwood Drive.
<br />
<br />Mr. Studt stated it appeared to him that the latest
<br />proposal is very acceptable.
<br />
<br />Mr. John White, 3404 Silver Lane, questioned what
<br />the price range of the units would be. The Director
<br />of Community Development stated that figures the
<br />applicant had originally used for the condominium
<br />units were $35,000 and up depending on the size of
<br />the unit purchased, but that these were very rough
<br />figures at this time.
<br />
<br />Motion by Senden, seconded by Benke to continue discussion
<br />on PRD #30 until February 27, 1980 at 7:35 p.m.
<br />5 ayes - 0 nayes - motion carried
<br />Council Business
<br />The Mayor directed receipt of a petition
<br />requesting Council consideration of the
<br />feasibility of construction of the connection
<br />between Silver Lane and l6th Avenue SW.
<br />
<br />Karen Mattison, 49 Oakwood Drive, stated she
<br />was concerned for traffic volumes in the area
<br />and would like to see this road connection
<br />completed.
<br />
<br />Petition
<br />for Street
<br />Improvements
<br />Silver Lane &
<br />l6th Avenue SW
<br />Report No. 80-13
<br />
|