My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-21-2009
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
PC Packets
>
2009
>
04-21-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2021 6:55:27 PM
Creation date
4/16/2009 10:40:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING REPORT <br /> DATE: April 16, 2009 <br /> CASE: ZA2009-002 <br /> SUBJECT: Zoning Code Amendment Impacting Section 6-390 <br /> APPLICANT: City of New Brighton <br /> REQUEST&BACKGROUND <br /> The City is requesting consideration of a Zoning Code amendment impacting Section 6-390 <br /> regarding loading dock facilities that face public rights-of-way. The current ordinance limits the <br /> number of dock doors facing public rights-of-way to one. The proposed amendment would <br /> allow up to three loading dock doors to face public rights-of-way when efforts are made to <br /> screen those facilities. <br /> The Planning Commission may recall that a Site Plan application made by The 614 Company for <br /> the Mission Foods plant at 1565 1st Avenue NW precipitated this amendment. This was because <br /> the approved Site Plan depicted three dock doors facing Old Highway 8 NW. The Commission <br /> and Council, throughout the Site Plan review process, determined these three doors should be <br /> allowed as they would be adequately screened behind a fence and gate system. That Site Plan <br /> was approved contingent on the City approving an amendment to Zoning Code Section 6-390 <br /> prior to release of a building permit for the Mission Foods expansion. As of the date of this <br /> report, a building permit has not yet been submitted for the proposed expansion. <br /> ATTACHMENTS <br /> A—Proposed Ordinance <br /> AMENDMENT ANALYSIS <br /> The proposed amendment was drafted to have minimal impact while allowing the Mission Foods <br /> expansion plans that have already been approved. Thus, the existing language remains <br /> unchanged and new language was added that allows more than one dock, but no more than three, <br /> when the facilities are screened from the public right-of-way by topography, landscaping and/or <br /> an opaque fencing system. The entire section is located below, with the new language <br /> underlined: <br /> "All loading docks and vehicular doors established after October 24, 1968, shall be, when <br /> facing a public right-of-way, fifty feet or more from the public right-of-way but at no time <br /> shall trucks or trailers cross the property line when parked. No more than one loading dock <br /> accommodating one truck at a time shall face a public street. More than one loading dock., <br /> but no more than three, may face a public right-of-way when the loading facilities are <br /> screened from that public right-of-way by topography, landscaping and/or an opaque <br /> fencing system with automated gate control_" <br /> As drafted, no more than three dock doors would be allowed to face a public right-of-way. Staff <br /> drafted the proposed amendment in this manner so as to limit the number of situations where an <br /> undesirable outcome results from the new language. As drafted, one dock door would remain <br /> allowed to face a public right-of-way unscreened. Lastly, the screening requirement is somewhat <br /> vague in that the applicant can choose what is best for the site. This portion of the language <br /> being vague also allows the Commission leeway to request further screening if it is thought that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.