Laserfiche WebLink
has dramatically changed since 2005 and the City should expect higher costs in the <br />future. <br />The City has essentially two options to consider, including: 1) extending the current <br />contract with Waste Management, or 2) pursuing an RFP for recycling services. The <br />following is a brief discussion of each option. <br />Option 1: Extending Current Contract <br />Staff met with Waste Management to obtain quotes for a contract extension. As an <br />aside, the current contract price is $1.70, which has been adjusted for inflation and a <br />fuel escalator. Waste Management provided the following pricing for 2010 which <br />includes a base price and the addition of an RMO (Recycling Materials Offset fee) used <br />in order to recoup the cost of sorting in a down market: <br />Dual Sort: $1.78 plus a 6% environmental charge, plus RMO (Recycling Materials <br />Offset fee) for a total cost of $2.50 per household. No additional bins or <br />carts would be required. <br />Single Sort: $2.01 plus a 6% environmental charge, plus RMO for a total cost of $2.63 <br />(City Carts) per household. This number assumes that the City would purchase the <br />rolling carts from Waste Management ($55 per cart x 6,300 carts = <br />• $346,500). <br />Single Sort: $2.70 plus a 6% environmental charge, plus RMO for a total cost of $3.41 <br />(WM Carts) per household. This number assumes that Waste Management provides <br />the rolling carts to residents. <br />Waste Management has stated they now charge a 6% environmental fee in order to <br />recoup fees charged by the State and County for processing. Waste Management also <br />incorporates an RMO, recycling materials offset, fee which is charged depending on the <br />market price of materials. When materials reach a price point, roughly $60.00 per ton, <br />the RMO would be removed and the base price plus the 6% environmental charge <br />would be our true cost. <br />If we did negotiate with Waste Management to extend the contract for another year our <br />hope would be that price points for recyclables would be over $60 by the end of the <br />year. This would eliminate the RMO and keep our recycling fee down. New Brighton <br />also has the option for a RFP in order to gage what other prices and options are <br />available. Staff believes we will not find a better price at this time due to the down <br />market than Waste Managements. <br />Option 2: Pursuing an RFP <br />The City may also do an RFP to see what types of services and pricing would be <br />offered. The City could ask for both single -sort and dual -sort proposals. If the City did <br />HARecycling info\Recycling Contract Worksession racmo (GF Final Edits),doc <br />