My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
void2
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2009
>
2009 Council Work Session Materials
>
void2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2018 6:30:30 PM
Creation date
6/5/2009 11:52:38 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
an RFP we would receive approximately 3-5 proposals. Most likely Eureka, Allied, <br />Waste Management and possibly smaller outfits like Ace would offer proposals. <br />Mary Chamberlain believes only Waste Management and Eureka would offer dual sort <br />recycling. Waste Management, Allied and possibly Ace would offer single sort. <br />Single -sort recycling would be significantly higher in comparison to dual -sort. This could <br />possibly double the amount charged to New Brighton residents. Staff believes the <br />recycling cost could come close to doubling to over $40 per year. With single sort <br />residents would not have too sort recycling into different bags or containers. One large <br />container would be provided and the residents would be able to roll it out fairly easily. <br />Dual -sort would have a price increase but not as high as single sort. Dual -sort is <br />believed to provide a "cleaner" type of material which makes it easier to sell and be <br />processed into new products. Residents are obviously familiar with dual -sort. No issues <br />as far as cost of containers and ownership. Eureka would also offer profit sharing which <br />could offset much of the higher cost when the market returns. <br />Recommendation <br />When thinking about recycling staff feels if price is the deciding factor, dual -sort is <br />obviously the lower cost at this point. Dual -sort recycling also allows for a "cleaner" <br />product that may ultimately allow more recycling material to be processed into new <br />. products. <br />However, if convenience and ease for our citizens are the deciding factor, single -sort <br />would be the way to go. Single -sort also usually generates higher amounts being <br />placed into the recycling container. <br />• <br />The City currently has Waste Management's first offer and could decide to accept any <br />of the options. The City also can decide to go out for a RFP in order to see what other <br />options and prices would be offered. The recycling market is currently at a 16 year low, <br />so all of the proposals will be higher now than when the market recovers. <br />HARecycling info\Recycling Contract Worksession memo (GF Final F,dits),doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.