Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION NO. <br />09-044 <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA <br />COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br />CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON <br />MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. <br />ks, an application has been made by CU Companies to permit an amendment to the <br />g Comprehensive Sign Plan governing allowed signage at Main Street Village and which <br />permit construction of a ground sign at 500 Main Street, and <br />�Hir, As, the procedural history of the application is as follows: <br />1, An application for a Special Use Permit was received on June 30, 2009. <br />2. The Planning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notices, held a public hearing <br />n July 21, 2009 and all present were given a chance to freely speak at the hearing. <br />3. hePlanning Commission recommended approval on July 21, 2009. <br />4. he City Council considered the request on July 28, 2009. <br />VHEII AS, the Planning Commission and City Council make the following Findings of Fact with <br />res ct to the Special Use Permit (SP2009-002): <br />1. he property is zoned b — 4, Downtown Business. <br />2. he property is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for City Center. <br />3. The proposed use of the site consists of a multi -tenant office building that includes CU <br />ompanies and Risdall Advertising. <br />4. Per Zoning Code Section 9-041 Main Street Village is considered a renewal area and is thus <br />permitted to adopt a Comprehensive Sign Plan, <br />5. 1 U the time of approval of Main Street Village a Comprehensive Sign Plan was approved and <br />as since been amended several times as the development nears completion and businesses <br />occupy the site <br />6. U Companies proposes to construct a ground sign at the southeast corner of 200 Main <br />7. e proposed sign would measure 7' x 10' 6" or 73.5 SF with a graphic area of 4.5' x 8' <br />r 36 SF, be 7' is total height, and be setback 10' from the property line of Main Street <br />d 5' from the property line of County Road E2. <br />S. The Planning Commission and City Council determined that because 25' of boulevard <br />ould <br />sted along County Road E2, a 5' setback would be acceptable instead of 10' as the sign <br />have a 30' setback from the curb. <br />9. a Planning Commission and City Council reviewed the proposal in accordance with the <br />Following Comprehensive Sign Plan findings of Zoning Code Section 9-041 (4) <br />That the sign plan provides sound identification, reduction of clutter, and aesthetic <br />enhancement. <br />That the sign plan is sensitive to and compatible with physical circumstances of the site <br />and buildings. <br />That the sign plan is not detrimental to public safety. <br />Development\7-2$-2009\SP2009-002 (CU Companies) - RESOLUTION,doe <br />