CCP 11-24-2009 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Approve would replace an existing light tower. Phillips asked if the four towers are contingent upon each other. Viera replied that they are contingent upon each other. Phillips asked if there was a reason why they are not bringing all four sites at the same time. Viera replied that the surveys and photo simulations have not been completed for the other sites. Danger asked if they are not approved on the additional sites would they continue with this site. Viera replied that he believes that they would and would then try to cover the gaps in coverage. Danger stated that he is concerned that by automatically extending the approval it would tie that location up if another carrier should decide that they would need it and could proceed without delay. Gundlach replied there is currently additional room for more carriers. Dangers inquired why the applicant is not asking a typical six month approval and then apply for an extension in six months. Gundlach replied that the applicant has expressed to staff that they may not be able to meet the deadline and are in the process of trying to secure as many locations as possible. She replied that if the Commission would like to approve only a six month time line that would be appropriate and then the applicant could then apply for an extension before the dead line expires. However, it is typical practice to approve six month extensions and doing it now would save a step later on. Motion by Schiferl, second by Zisla to CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. 5 ayes, 0 nays. MOTION APPROVED. Zisla stated that he does not have a problem with the twelve month timeline, since they have a clear reason. Schiferl and Danger both replied that they were only worried about setting a precedent for future applications, but do not object to the extension. Motion by Zisla, second by Schiferl to ADOPT THE RESOLUTION PROVIDED RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. Interior placement of the ground equipment within the water tower is subject to change at the discretion of the Director of Public Works so as to not block entrance/exit doors and to best utilize the vacant interior space. 2. The special use permit shall be valid for 12 months from the date of City Council approval. 3. The applicant must enter into a lease agreement with the City. 5 ayes, 0 nays. MOTION APPROVED. Public Hearing: ZA2009-003 Zoning Code Amendment Impacting Chapter 7 -w Pertaining to Amendment Criteria for approved Planned Residential & Planned Unit Developments The City is requesting a Zoning Code amendment that impacts Chapter 7 of the Zoning Code. Specifically, the amendment would create standards that approved planned residential development and planned unit developments would have to meet in order to be granted an amendment. The amendment as 0