05-18-2010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

in light of the financial imports of removing the garage in this area and re-patching pavement to ensure absentia drainage. B. The impact of my nonconformity upon adjacent premises is reduced to the grates[ practical extent. With regard to the member of of street parking stalls, staff agrees with the applicant's statement that corflaw! Parking needs to be reduced uo it has a direct negative rmpacl an adjacent Promertres. In fact Public Safety over Public Works have received complaints regarding mrstreet parking in this location As such, seadlifirrils the trade -off between covered and surface looking is appropriate at this site and will reduce the parking shortage impact upon adjacempropertres. With regard to setbacks, it is unlikely the existing nonconJwming parMng lot setbacks are having any impact on adjaceirpropertues However, any expansion ofgreen space would seem beneficialfrom an aesthetic standpoint. C. The extent of my marmin enmity is reduced where practical. With regard to the member of fstreet parking stalls, the layout and topography of the site on't protocol to Provide the combination of 71 covered parking stalls ant 113 surface parking stalls to meet the lad requirement of 185 parking stalls. StafJinds the trade-offofcoveredporkingl r surface parking is the most practical wiry to deal with the Parking shortage monconformiy. With regard to setbacks, the nonconforming front (1" AVE NIY) and rear (1-3599 setbacks can be reduced and/or eliminated Theframyardsetbacknorrcarefirrmiycanbe reduced from O'to 15' in conjunction with the garage demo and associated pavement improvements. The rear yard setback nonconformity can be eliminated if the college decides m proceed wrth the future plant to curb areas afthe parking lot ant rerorutuaruct uussidewalks. While the 15'setback coddbe achievedrelatiody easily. achieving a5' ear yard setback has subsmnoal financial implications. As such staff would emend conditions ofapPrm al to deal with these Possibilities and in a manner to rat beumeasonable with regard tofnancial impacts. In conclusion, staff finds allowing removal of covered parking in exchange for surface parking is an appropriate trade -off for two important reasons: I) it will provide for a net increase of 14-17 stats bringing the site into compliance with the retummucut thaz 155 off sheet parking stalls are provided, and 2) to decrmese use of on-street parking that effects the neighborhood in a negative wourner. In fight of all these lectors, stag finds the wncontbrrvivg use criteria of Section 8-460 to be ran.