CCP 05-25-2010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Approved map amendment will have to obtain another Inver. Ms. Gundlach explained all existing LGMA's should be incorporated into the new system. Motion by Commissioner Zisla, seconded by Commisiooer Nichols-Mathahi to close the Public Hearing. Approved 6-0, the Public Hearing was closed. Chair Howard asked if residents we required to do anything regarding the new on, Ms. Gundlach reported Insurance Companies will contact residents if there are changes to individual properties. Commissioner Danger asked if there was data indicating when the last 100 year flood has occurred. Ms. Gundlach did not have that information available. Commissioner Nichols-Madmili asked if the language n the ordinance is Ne language recommended by FEMA, Ms. Gundlach cmirmed it was. Councilmember Phillips questioned if the City's ordinance reflects the State's requirements for non- conforming strucNres. Ms. Gundlach replied there are very few principle s[mcmres in flood plains, currently our ordinance does not follow the Straw's requirements. Chair Howard questioned if FEMA would lake precedence over the State law, Ms. Gundlach stated she would check with the City Ahomcy, but suspected that was the case, Commissioner Danger asked if stets is information detailing how far up the flood line could lam as there are many his properties who have added onto the back of their homes. Ms. Gundlach explained when a building permit is obtained she homeowner is required to provide information related to their elevation to determine if those structures are outside the 100' flood elevation assigned to the mea, as well as obtaining verification from the Rice Creek Waterahed District. Ms. Gundlach explained we are rwquirad to adopt the ordinance by June 4, 2010, and from isn't a choice in the matter if the City wants to ensure residents are able in purchase flood insurance fl muPp the National Flood Insurance Program. Ms. Gundlach recommended making a separate motion for staff to look into the stare requirements on nonconforming uses and how they compere with the floodplain ordinance standards on nonconforming uses. Ms GWdli ch indicated she will follow up on the issue. Motion by Commissioner McPherson, seconded by Commissioner Alvey to make a motion N approve staff recommendation. Approved 6-0 It was determined to wait until a situation antes and look into the comflicting language between the Federal and State requirements at that time. 3. City of New Brighton requests consideration of a Zoning Code amendment amending Chapter 7 to clarity expiration dates for Planned Unit Development and Planned Residential Development approves that are not acted on within a specified period of time. The City of New Brighton is requesting consideration of a Zoning Code amendment to Chapter J regarding expiration dates for Planned Residential Developments (PRD) and Planned Unit Developments (PUD). The current language is either completely silent on expiration dates (PUD dardards) or indicates that Ne City Council must establish expiration dates at the some of approval (I)RD standards). The