Laserfiche WebLink
Not Approved <br />allow the Planning Commission and/or du: City Council to review the criteria presented and make a <br />determination from there. Commissioner Zisla reiteretd it is his opinion that dic commission needs to <br />maintain the integrity of du: process. <br />Motion by Commissioner Zisla seconded by Commissioner Sehiferl, to close the Public Hearing. <br />Approved 60, the Public Hearing was closed <br />Commissioner Nichols Matkaiti questioned the specific aspect of the variance requvements. City <br />Planner Gundlach responded her recommendation is has most of the valid hardships relate to the front <br />yard setback, and does not believe the pinching effect is a valid hardship iMerent to the land, because <br />there are other options. Commissioner Zisla stated the commission has room to work wiN the applicarn <br />to approve the requested variance. <br />Motion by Commusiouer Zulu, seconded by Commissioner Nichols-Matkaifi to make a motion to <br />approve the front yard variance and the side yard variance of 4 fret, and the non-coaforaaing use <br />City Planner Gundmith directed the commission to amend the findings of fact noted in the resolution. <br />Commissioner Zisla suggested the appropriate amendments. <br />Commissioner Schifl questioned the reasonable use detenninarion. Commissioner Zisla explained it is <br />a complicated issue, if there is a reasonable use on du: property, the community can grant a varianse. <br />Commissioner Scldfl suggested the City Attorney review, the recotnmwdation prior to the council <br />meeting. <br />Approved 6-0 <br />Adjournment: 8:34 PM <br />