CCP 07-27-2010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Report Number 10-179 Agenda Section VIII-1 she ca, the",rxa hs loco CouncilMeeting Date July 27, 2010 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRR'TION: Consideration of a Special Use Permit for Jeff Van Der Wal to pound conduction of an aCCessc building in excess of 624 SF at 1,0565F or IM715N AVE W. DEPARTMENT HEAD'S APPROVAL: Grant remelius, CommunityDevelopment Dimcmr CITY MANAGER'S APPROVAL: No comments to supplement Nu reortSQG Comments atthat 15.99 DeadBne: July 2], 2010, extended to September 25, 2010 Recommendation: Adopt the attached Resolution, approving the Special Use Truman, subject to the following fon conditions: 1. The applicant agrees not conduct a home occupation within the goings structure. 2. The exterior materials and colors for the proposed accessory structure shall match and/or compliment The home. 3. The applicant is responsible for providing both winter and sumorr r vegetative screening on the applicant's side of the southerly lot line should the existing vegetative screening on the neighboring lot ever be removed. 4. The applicant implements the Landscape Plan as proposed for the east side of the proposed building. •Legislative History: June 15, 2010: The Planning Commission opened the public hearing and discussed the proposed accessory, smmtme. The Planning Commission expressed concerns regarding the size of the structure and its visual impact when viewed from the lake. One resident expressed ncemsthatpdvatecovenantsmayexistprobibifingtceswcnue. Because the applicant wasn't present is address Neu concerns, me Commission tabled action to the July 20, 2010 Planning Commission meeting. July 20,2010: The Planning Commission continued the public hearing. No residents attended the meeting or expressed concerns to City stab. The applicant addressed the Planning Commission's concerns from the June 15th meeting regarding private storage needs. Staff provided information to Ne Commission suggesting that if covumenr; exist they have int been historically enforced and that it wasn't The City's role to enforce private covenants. The Commission continued to express concems regarding the ability to screen the stnhcmre so as to mitigate its visual imposed. The Commission recommended two conditions that would rum to replace vegetative screening to the south if it were removed and to require submittal of a Landscape Plan for the outclass side of the structure prior to City Council consideration. The applicant submitted a Landscape Plan psee attached), which staff finds acceptable, and condition N4 above ensures it will he implemented. Financial Impact: None Explanation: The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit to allow concoction of a 24' x 44' demcbed postage totally 1,056 SF. The garage would be located in dm backyard, which is the southeast •side of the property, and would he setback 50' from the lake and 5' fiom the side lot line. All other se0cecks for all arbor structures on site are coNormiug. Becuuse the square f page of the detached