My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WS 08-24-2010
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2010
>
2010 Council Work Session Materials
>
WS 08-24-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2018 7:44:13 PM
Creation date
8/20/2010 4:15:25 PM
Metadata
该页面上没有批注。
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Stuart Negotiations Update <br />August 20, 2010 <br />Page 3 <br />Park Dedication <br />Stuart has said that the City's park dedication fees are high. Staff has countered that <br />New Brighton is one of the lowest in the metro area, according to a 2009 survey. <br />Nonetheless, we recognize that park dedication fees are a significant cash outlay <br />($200,000) for the developer. Staff initially proposed spreading out the payments over <br />ten years. Stuart agreed to this concept. <br />Reaction: Because Stuart Companies is proposing to adjust the land price by <br />$300,000 and still wants the park dedication deferral; this has the appearance of <br />"double dipping". Staff would suggest either demanding the full park dedication <br />fee payment up front or 50% at closing and deferring the balance over 10 years. <br />Look Back Provisions <br />The City is proposing a dual "look back" provision <br />At completion of the construction of the building, the developer shall submit a <br />complete list of costs for the project in accordance with generally accepted <br />accounting principals. If the costs of the project are less than the project budget <br />as submitted to the City, the first $200,000 would be repaid to cover the balance <br />of unpaid park dedication fees. Any remaining project budget would be split <br />between the City and the developer at a 50% (city) / 50% (developer) level. <br />Stuart is suggesting a 25%/75% split instead. <br />The second look back would only be invoked if the developer sells the building <br />within 10 years. At the time of the sale, the developer would prepare a <br />description of sales proceeds, equity invested, and annual cash flow (excluding <br />depreciation). If such a calculation results in proceeds in excess of a 16% <br />internal rate of return, the remainder is split between the City and the developer <br />at a 50%/50% level. Stuart has agreed to this concept. <br />Reaction: Staff suggests a couple options: 1) If the developer agrees to pay park <br />dedication fees up front, then a 250/o175% split might be acceptable; or 2) holding <br />firm on 50/50 split on project cost, but reducing the amount to $100,000. <br />Development Fees <br />The City is requesting that the developer pay $7,500 up front to cover the City's legal <br />and public finance advisor costs. Stuart has agreed to this demand. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.