Laserfiche WebLink
Stuart Negotiations Update <br />August 20, 2010 <br />Page 4 <br />Development Analysis <br />Staff has asked Ehlers to prepare a quick analysis of the Stuart proposal as currently <br />envisioned. The attached 3 -page analysis is based on 120 units with a minimum <br />valuation of $97,600 per unit ($11.7M) at construction and 3% inflation. Under this set <br />of assumptions, the project generates $4.8M in tax increment (gross amount) with a <br />present value of $2.7M. <br />To put this in perspective, this amount of TIF is still more than what the City anticipated <br />under the worst case scenarios (1 B and 3B), which assumed a 110 unit senior condo- <br />minium project starting in 2016 with full valuation in 2019. While it is less than our best <br />case scenarios (1A and 3B), it is important to note that these scenarios assumed <br />construction would start in 2011 with full valuation in 2014. It is highly unlikely that the <br />City will find a senior condominium or cooperative to break ground in the same time <br />frame as the Stuart proposal. <br />Final Thoughts <br />There are many moving pieces to these negotiations. Each side has made demands <br />that have to be carefully evaluated. There are no easy answers. If the Council believes <br />the terms are unreasonable, then we need specific direction on a counter proposal. It is <br />our belief that this project has many positive attributes (i.e. good public relations, earlier <br />development start, etc.) that outweigh some of the initial concessions. We should <br />consider both the loss of cash assistance that will not be available after June 30, 2010 <br />($1.2M) and the present value of tax increment ($150,000+ per year). <br />