Laserfiche WebLink
City Planner Gundlach stated there are three possible actions the commission could take; 3 actions <br />are possible; 1) Recommend the City Council adopt the Overlay Ordinance as revised by staff, <br />including the license and hours of operation requirements. 2) Recommend approval of the Special <br />Use Permit for aggregate crushing and recycling, subject to the 11 conditions outlined in the revised <br />resolution. 3) Recommend approval of the Special Use Permit for a yard waste transfer facility, <br />subject to the 12 conditions outlined in the revised resolution. (site plan approval is noted in both the <br />special use permit resolutions) <br />Commissioner Nichols-Matkaiti questioned the licensing; if two separate licenses would be required <br />annually? City Planner Gundlach responded there would be two separate licenses each year. Ms. <br />Gundlach clarified the fee is to cover the costs of staff. Chair Howard requested clarification between <br />the license requirement and a Special Use Permit. Ms. Gundlach responded licensing allows the City <br />more leverage in terms of making sure applicant is in compliance with Special Use Permit, <br />Commissioner Danger questioned the number of annual licenses the City currently has. Gundlach <br />replied there are many types of licenses, including liquor, 3.2 beer, cigarettes as well as others. <br />Commissioner Zisla questioned what is included in the license requirements, and whether the City should <br />have a license requirement as part of all Special Use Permits. Ms. Gundlach responded licensing <br />requirements are addressed in Chapter 15 of the City Code; included in the license are an annual <br />inspection, and a collection of a fee. Ms Gundlach described this site a unique as it is hidden from the <br />main road, and a license would allow unannounced inspections. The City Attorney has reviewed and <br />approved the licensing requirement. <br />Commissioner Schiferl questioned if shrubs could be considered for esthetics and erosion control. Ms. <br />Gundlach stated shrubs would not be necessary on top of the berm, and a native grass mix is planned for <br />the slope. <br />Commissioner Zisla questioned the concern the hours of operation limitation is addressing. Ms. <br />Gundlach responded it is thought the trucks accessing the site would involve noise, and it would be <br />beneficial to limit the hours of operation. <br />Chairperson Howard opened the Public Hearing at 7:39 pm. <br />Roger Schilling 1187 Mississippi St. questioned the manner in which noise is measured. Mr. Schilling <br />requested measuring the peaks of every frequency, because the banging of the tailgates must be higher <br />than the average reported. Mr. Schilling reported the tailgate noise still occurs a couple times per day. <br />Tim Collins, representing Wenk Associates completed the noise analysis for the site. The standard <br />method of measuring noise counts all noises from about 31 cycles per second up to about 8,000. The <br />noise is measured the way the human ear hears the noise. Another component looks at the fluctuation of <br />sound over time, and an average is reported. <br />Chairperson Howard questioned if the measurements, other than average will ever exceed the specific <br />dbas limits within the overlay district. Ms. Gundlach responded the ordinance is written to limit the <br />noise to at least half as loud at the lot line. Chairperson Howard questioned the way to test compliance. <br />Ms. Gundlach responded upon reason, the City will confirm the applicant is in compliance. <br />Commissioner McPherson questioned if the maximum is 56.5 dba at the residents, what is the maximum <br />db level, not dba. Mr. Collins was not able to answer that. <br />Commissioner Danger questioned why not look at maximum instead of the average. Ms. Gundlach <br />explained all the extrapolation was based on 108 dba rating on the tailgate bang. <br />Mr. Collins reported when the tail gate bang was analyzed, they intentionally set up a loud tailgate bang, <br />and had them bang it several times, The average was 108, the cluster was within a few tenths of a <br />decibel. Mr. Collins reported the back-up alarms would likely not be heard upon completion of the berm. <br />2 <br />