My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 05-22-2012
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2012
>
CCP 05-22-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2021 10:03:22 PM
Creation date
5/18/2012 2:32:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved <br /> favor of a rear call box, as they prefer to have visitors utilize the front entrance. Ms. Harrison also commented that <br /> a call box may be difficult to install; as there are space limitations. <br /> Commissioner Danger agreed with Planner Gundlach,that guest may be less likely to use the rear lot if there is not <br /> a secure access. One of the residents suggested adding a call box at a side entrance, as there is more space there. <br /> Planner Gundlach clarified that the call box would be mounted on the exterior, and there would be no need to <br /> expand the entrance. <br /> Commissioner Nichols-Matkaiti asked if there are any ADA requirements for the southerly entrance. Planner <br /> Gundlach stated that the Building Official will review that as part of the overall plan review. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Danger,seconded by Commissioner Nichols-Matkaiti to close the Public Hearing. <br /> Approved 5-0 <br /> Motion by Commissioner Shardlow,seconded by Commissioner Meyers to approve staff recommendation. <br /> City Planner Gundlach clarified that the call box requirement is one of the conditions of the resolution. <br /> Commissioner Nichols-Matkaiti suggested removing condition number 2 related to lighting; as it seems the area is <br /> currently adequately lit. <br /> Planner Gundlach stated that this is the time to require a call box, stating that if in the future,the residents desire to <br /> remove the call box,that could be reviewed through a request for an amendment to the PRD. <br /> Chair Howard clarified that the motion is to recommend the City Council approve the request with the following <br /> five conditions: <br /> • The parking lot expansion is built in accordance with the submitted plans. <br /> • The entrance on the south side of the building is enhanced to promote use of the expanded parking by <br /> visitors of Crossroads. <br /> • The Civil Engineering comments on surface water are met. <br /> • Submission of the Rice Creek Watershed District permit to the City prior to commencing work. <br /> • The fire truck access from Thorndale is repaired (the bollards) and maintained (the pavers) as <br /> necessary, and snow is kept clear, to ensure appropriate access is available in the event of an <br /> emergency. <br /> Approved 5-0 <br /> (B) The City of New Brighton requests consideration of amendments to the 2030 New Brighton <br /> Comprehensive Plan regarding transportation and surface water updates. <br /> City Planner Gundlach reported that the Metropolitan Council has amended their regional transportation plan; state <br /> statute requires that the New Brighton update our comprehensive plan as well. The City wants to take this <br /> opportunity to amend the surface water management plan, as it is part of the comprehensive plan. It was <br /> recommended the item be tabled until the July 17th Planning Commission meeting. <br /> Chairperson Howard asked for comments;there were none. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Danger, seconded by Commissioner Shardlow to table the item to the July 17, <br /> 2012. <br /> Approved 5-0 <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.