Laserfiche WebLink
August 28,2012 Page 4 of 6 <br /> sidewalks and trail crossings on the four bridges that would be reconstructed in the near future. City Planner <br /> Gundlach stated the 15 feet would provide a best case scenario for the City and was not guaranteed. Director <br /> of Public Works Wyffels commented the additional language would express to MnDOT the City's intent and <br /> need for a crossing at these bridges. He explained that by revising the Comprehensive Plan the City would be <br /> in a good position with MnDOT when the bridges were reconstructed. <br /> Councilmember Bauman was pleased that the E2 and County Road 96 bridges were slated for reconstruction. <br /> Director of Public Works Wyffels reviewed a timeline for these bridges noting County Road 96 would be <br /> worked on in 2015 and E2 in 2016. City Planner Gundlach commented at this time,City staff was unaware if <br /> the bridges would be reconstructed or re-decked. Director of Public Works Wyffels explained that staff <br /> would work to have these bridges reconstructed. <br /> Councilmember Jacobsen thanked staff for initiating these amendments. <br /> Councilmember Burg was pleased that the trails were being considered in this plan,as there was a rise in <br /> bicycle riding throughout the community. <br /> Councilmember Samuelson also thanked staff for the time spent on reviewing the City's needs. <br /> Mayor Jacobsen stated the safety of the community was imperative and the trail connections over the City's <br /> bridges were necessary. He did not want to see MnDOT or the Met Council choosing a low-cost high impact <br /> solution in this area. The City needed safe passage across its bridges. <br /> Motion by Councilmember Samuelson seconded by Councilmember Burg to adopt a Resolution <br /> amending the 2030 New Brighton Comprehensive Plan,including adoption of an updated and revised <br /> Surface Water Management Plan. <br /> 5 Ayes,0 Nays-Motion Carried <br /> 3.Consideration of City <br /> 3. Consideration of City Project 12-15,New Brighton Exchange Tract 2 Import Soil Project. Project 12-15,New <br /> BrExchange Tract 2 <br /> Report No. 12-210. Import <br /> SoilProject Report <br /> No.12-210. <br /> City Manager Lotter stated the City needs soil to be imported to Block I of the New Brighton Exchange. City <br /> staff has found a cost savings method to complete this task and the Council was being asked to consider the <br /> item this evening. <br /> Director of Public Works Wyffels indicated staff was approached by Shafer Contracting as they have excess <br /> material from the 1-694 and Highway 10 project. After a meeting on August 13, 2012, staff has been <br /> preparing a contract. Shaffer Contracting has 100,000 cubic yards of excess soil and the west side of NBE <br /> Tract 2 is approximately 200,000 cubic yards short of material. The imported soil would be geotechnical and <br /> environmentally suitable. The cost to import material on the open market would be$8-10 per cubic yard. <br /> Shafer Contracting was willing to move the material for a cost of$1.00 per cubic yard and were willing to <br /> credit the City$30,000 for the Class 7 material on the New Brighton Exchange site. The environmental <br /> testing expense would be split between the two parties, while the geotechnical testing would be the <br /> responsibility of the City. hi total,the project could cost up to $101,250. Staff recommended the Council <br /> enter into a contract with Shafer Contracting to import, place and compact up to 100,000 cubic yards of <br /> import material in an amount not to exceed$1.00 per cubic yard of soil material imported into the NBE site. <br /> All costs associated with this project would be financed by the respective NBE I'll-districts. <br /> Councilmember Burg commented Shafer had to get rid of the dirt and questioned how the City would <br /> monitor the material. She did not want any poor material brought into the City,as this has happened in the <br /> past with this contractor,which led to a lawsuit. She did not find this contractor to be trustworthy. Director of <br /> Public Works Wyffels explained that excess material was being trucked to Rosemount at this time. The <br /> contractor had other offers on the table and the material was being offered to the City for free,while the City <br /> was only paying for the placement and compacting. He noted the contractor has provided staff with soil <br /> testing and all looked positive to date. Additional testing would be completed as the project was completed <br /> He indicated 25 cubic yards would be brought into the City per day and additional testing would occur on the <br /> material each day. Director of Public Works Wyffels commented that the contract between the City and <br /> Shafer Contracting would assure that both parties were held to defined specifications. He understood the City <br />