My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WS Materials 09-04-2012
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2012
>
2012 Council Work Session Materials
>
09-04-2012
>
WS Materials 09-04-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2021 8:17:59 AM
Creation date
11/6/2012 12:35:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMO <br /> To: Dean Lotter, City Manager <br /> From: Dan Maiers, Finance Director <br /> Date: August 29, 2012 <br /> Re: Tax Levies and General Fund Property Tax Revenues <br /> During the July 24th City Council worksession on the 2013 Budget, overall trends of <br /> General Fund revenues were discussed. The graph of the "General Fund Revenues Ten <br /> Year Summary by Category by $" was discussed (graph attached). The following has <br /> been prepared to assist with an enhanced understanding of the specifics driving the <br /> General Fund's property tax revenue trend line. <br /> A. The Tax Levy doesn't necessarily equal General Fund Property tax revenues. <br /> There are a number of reasons that the General Fund property tax revenues will not <br /> equal the tax levy. The following are some examples: <br /> 1. Taxes levies are not paid by taxpayers on a timely basis (delinquencies). <br /> 2. Property values are appealed resulting in lower values after the County has <br /> spread the tax levy. These properties then pay less in property taxes than were <br /> originally levied upon that specific property. The difference in the amounts <br /> results in revenues which are permanently lost. <br /> 3. The total tax levy may have components included in addition to the general <br /> operating tax levy. Many communities have their debt service tax levy <br /> separate from their general operating levies. The specific debt service levy <br /> goes directly into the applicable debt service fund, not into the General Fund. <br /> 4. In prior years the State had a Market Value Homestead Credit program <br /> (MVHC). The State would reduce the City's portion of the homestead <br /> property taxes by this credit and then reimburse the City for those credits. <br /> The State Legislature reduced and eventually eliminated these reimbursements <br /> from their budget resulting in cities bearing the burden of the State cuts. <br /> Attached is a schedule comparing the general operating levy to the General Fund's <br /> tax revenues for the last ten years. <br /> B. Reasons driving the trend line of the General Fund's property tax revenues are <br /> crucial to interpreting the trend line. The following are some of the more significant <br /> reasons for increases in the tax levies and the General Fund's tax revenues: <br /> 1. 2003 —increased in anticipation of significant cuts to State aid revenues. <br /> 2. 2004—increased to replace the State's elimination of LGA to the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.