My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PC Packet 08-20-2013
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
PC Packets
>
2013
>
PC Packet 08-20-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2021 8:03:25 AM
Creation date
9/17/2013 2:37:15 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the existing home and build a new one, significant topographic corrections would need to be <br /> made. These are circumstances not created by the landowner. <br /> 4) Character of the locality <br /> This criterion is likely met. This neighborhood is one of the older neighborhoods in New <br /> Brighton and setbacks less than the current standard are common, especially on corner lots. <br /> In fact, of the other three homes on the corner of 7th ST NW and 2"d AVE NW, only one meets <br /> all current setback standards. Further, one home, one house away sits at a setback to 7th ST <br /> NW that is less than what the applicant is proposing. <br /> 5) Consistency with comprehensive plan <br /> This criterion is met. The applicant proposes to use the space for living space and will not <br /> change the residential character of the home. <br /> The applicant provided responses to these criteria on the attached Variance Standards <br /> Worksheet. After a full analysis of the standards outlined in Minnesota Statutes 462.357, staff <br /> finds the criteria have been met due to the following points: <br /> • The existing home is only one-bedroom and 480 SF. The proposed addition is only 360 <br /> SF bringing the total home size to 840 SF. With the home being single-story, the <br /> additional square footage proposed is very reasonable with regard to livability. <br /> • Any addition to the existing home cannot be accomplished within setback because the <br /> entire home lies within the required 30' setback (see attached setback illustration <br /> prepared by staff). <br /> • Having the proposed deck meet the 30' setback to 2nd AVE NW may present access <br /> issues from the living room. It may be appropriate to inquire if the applicant can shift the <br /> deck to meet the 30' setback from 2nd AVE NW, while still allowing access to the deck <br /> from the living room. <br /> • The only way a conforming structure could be built on the lot would be to remove the <br /> existing home and build a new one. To accomplish this, significant grading efforts would <br /> be necessary due to the existing topography of the lot. Also, it has not been past practice <br /> to prevent improvements to a home when meeting the strict interpretation of the code <br /> requires removal of the principal structure. <br /> • Setbacks less than required are not out of character with this older New Brighton <br /> neighborhood. <br /> NONCONFORMING USE PERMIT ANALYSIS <br /> As mentioned numerous times in the Variance Analysis section above, the existing home and <br /> garage are setback less than the required 30' from 7th ST NW. This setback ranges from 5'-6'. <br /> Also, the existing front yard setback to 2"d AVE NW is less than the required 30'. This setback <br /> is 20'. In order to allow an expansion to a nonconforming structure, at least one of the following <br /> nonconforming use criteria of Section 8-460 must be met(staff responses in italics): <br /> 1) The total number of nonconformities is reduced. <br /> This criterion is not met. The applicant is not proposing to reduce the nonconformity. <br /> 2) The impact of any nonconformity upon adjacent premises is reduced to the greatest practical <br /> extent. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.