Laserfiche WebLink
November 2013 <br /> EDC Supplemental Meeting Notes <br /> Page 2 <br /> C. Update on Alternative Financial Modeling <br /> As reported at the October EDC meeting, staff has been working with Ehlers and the Ryan/Colliers <br /> team on a alternative financial model for New Brighton Exchange. The goal of this exercise, is to <br /> create a dashboard analysis that shows the minimum level of development needed to support debt <br /> service payments (i.e. based on development in the ground and pending) and then what happens as <br /> different assumptions are adjusted on the east side. To the extent development density is higher or <br /> happens sooner, the City could possibly achieve a better return on its investment. <br /> In previous years, we have prepared a number of different scenarios that looked at the development <br /> potential of the site and associated resources (tax increment) that might be generated. As development <br /> has occurred, we have been better able to update the model and have greater confidence in the <br /> projections. For example, the west side will be fully developed, assuming the Pulte and APi projects <br /> move ahead as planned. On the east side of Old Highway 8, there are roughly 25 acres of net <br /> developable land to develop. Although we have identified five development blocks, the City and <br /> future developers do have some flexibility in how the sites layout. For example, Lots A and B could <br /> be combined (as well as D and E or E and F) for a larger project. Our marketing partners at Ryan Co. <br /> and Colliers have provided concept plans for how that might that be accomplished on some blocks. <br /> Over the years we have received some feedback that the models are too optimistic and perhaps are less <br /> helpful in answering in a key question: how much additional development is needed to make the <br /> project self-sufficient (i.e. adequate to pay NBE debt service)? In an effort to answer that question, we <br /> are taking a different approach in presenting the information. In lieu of multiple scenarios, we have <br /> prepared a one-page "dashboard" or snapshot that looks at the minimum amount of development <br /> needed to cover the NBE bonds. <br /> The revised financial model takes into consideration the following components: <br /> o The City needs to generate approximately$32M of total tax increment(life of district) to help <br /> support debt service. It is important to remember that for the next 11 years,NBE debt service is <br /> also being supported by pooled increment from other TIF districts. <br /> o To achieve $32M of total tax increment, the City needs develop roughly$109,900,000 of taxable <br /> market value upon full-build out. <br /> o To achieve $109,900,000 of taxable market value, the City will rely on the development already in <br /> place ($28M); the development planned for APi's expansion and Pulte Homes ($43M); and at least <br /> $38M of additional development on the east side. <br /> o Under a Minimum Development Scenario there are adequate resources to cover debt service and <br /> approximately$4.6M of cash remaining in Fund 460) at end of the project(2031-2032). <br />