My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-10-2014
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2014
>
CCP 06-10-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2014 12:25:47 PM
Creation date
6/6/2014 3:47:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 27, 2014 Page 2 of 11 <br />Special Order of Business <br />1. Comcast Presentation to the City Council Regarding the Cable Franchise Renewal. Report <br />No. 14 -116. <br />City Manager Lotter reported Cor Wilson, with CTV would be coming before the Council on June I O' with <br />information regarding the cable franchise. He indicated Carley Warner with Comcast had a presentation for <br />the Council this evening. <br />Carley Warner, Comcast, introduced herself and thanked the Council for their time. She clarified Comcast's <br />position and provided context on the proposed franchise renewal. She provided the Council with a handout <br />and was proud of the $1 billion investment Comcast has made in the metro area. She discussed what this <br />investment meant to residents of New Brighton and how each customer now had access to cutting edge <br />services, including high -speed broadband. She explained the City's 1998 franchise was about to expire and <br />noted the City would have to take formal action on the franchise before June 20"'. She reported the formal <br />negotiation process had commenced. She indicated Comcast was not trying to kill local programming. It <br />was her opinion, that the North Suburban Cable Commission was conditioning the cable franchise on <br />unlawful monetary demands. She requested the Council understand that Comcast was already paying New <br />Brighton 5% from cable fees or $500,000 per year. This fee was not in dispute. However, on top of these <br />fees, the NSCC was requesting PEG fees in excess of $7.50 per month per customer, which were <br />significantly higher than the PEG fees charged to other metro area customers. She then reviewed the PEG <br />fees charged to other metro area residents. Ms. Warner reviewed the demands that local franchises could <br />make based on FCC limitations stating that local franchises could not request PEG fees over and above the <br />5% franchise fee. However, local franchises could request reasonable and adequate PEG capital fees could <br />be made. She reported that the formal negotiation process was established to encourage investment in cable <br />systems and to protect the investment Comcast has made in the system. Refusing to provide support for the <br />franchise because of the PEG fees was not a lawful reason for denial. She believed that the local network has <br />not planned for the transition off of PEG fees. She explained that the $7.50 PEG fee would make Comcast <br />uncompetitive in this market. She encouraged the local cable commission to consider the value added to its <br />customers through the high PEG fees if they were to continue. She reported that the PEG fees in New <br />Brighton were higher than anywhere else in the nation. She urged the Council to view the April meeting that <br />was held in Shoreview, along with the formal document provided by Comcast counsel dated Friday, May 23, <br />2014. She explained there would be a long, expensive formal process if the City were to deny Comcast's <br />franchise. <br />Councilmember Burg thanked Ms. Warner for her presentation. She indicated she served on the Cable <br />Commission previously. She asked if the PEG fee was simply a pass through fee, why the rate mattered. She <br />questioned the market share that Comcast had in the metro area She inquired what percentage of customers <br />had basic cable. Ms. Warner did not have the statistics on Comcast's market share in front of her this evening. <br />She indicated high PEG fees were impacting competition, which led the FCC to set limits. <br />Councilmember Burg asked what PEG fee amount Comcast was proposing. Ms. Warner stated the formal <br />proposal was $0.44 for PEG fees. <br />Councilmember Burg questioned how local franchises would continue to operate such a drastic reduction in <br />PEG fees. Ms. Warner understood that a major change was being proposed. She reviewed how other <br />municipalities were making this work. She indicated franchise fees were now to be used for PEG access <br />operations. She indicated the shift will not kill PEG programming as other municipalities were making this <br />change work. <br />Councilmember Jacobsen inquired if franchise fees were for right -of - -way access. Ms. Warner stated this was <br />correct that Comcast paid franchise fees for rent on City right -of -ways. She commented that the federal <br />government has limited PEG access fees, while still requiring Comcast to provide channels. It was now up to <br />local franchises to use franchise fees to cover their programming. PEG fees were not set at an amount that <br />would reasonably cover capital costs. <br />Councilmember Burg asked if Comcast would continue to provide scholarships to local students. Ms. <br />Warner reported the local cable commission would now have to draw from franchise fees to cover any future <br />Special Order of <br />Business <br />1. ComcastPresentation <br />to the City Council <br />Regardingthe Cable <br />Franchise Renewal. Repod <br />No. 14 -116. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.