My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PC Packet 07-15-2014
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
PC Packets
>
2014
>
PC Packet 07-15-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2021 8:51:20 AM
Creation date
7/18/2014 2:02:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a. That the establishment, maintenance, or operations of the special use will not be <br /> detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare. <br /> b. That the special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in <br /> the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and <br /> impair property values within the neighborhood. <br /> c. That the establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly <br /> development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the <br /> district. <br /> d. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been or are <br /> being provided. <br /> e. That the special use shall in all other respects conform to the applicable regulations of the <br /> district in which it is located. <br /> 9. The Planning Commission determined that all special use conditions of Section 9-041 and <br /> Section 8-130 have been met, based on the following points: <br /> a. The proposed monument sign is no larger than the existing monument sign. <br /> b. The proposed monument sign, and the justification for two monument signs, is that they <br /> provide identification for tenants of two buildings that reside on a corner lot. <br /> c. The proposed monument sign setback is consistent with the existing monument sign <br /> setback. <br /> d. The larger logo signs are insignificant when viewed from two stories up. <br /> e. The wall sign graphics are consistent with the originally approved Comprehensive Sign <br /> Plan for Main Street Village. <br /> Now THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that based upon the above findings of fact the application <br /> for a Special Use Permit (SP2014-004) is hereby recommended to the City Council for <br /> approval as submitted. <br /> Adopted this 15th day of July, 2014. <br /> Bruce Howard, Planning Commission Chair <br /> ATTEST: <br /> Janice Gundlach, City Planner <br /> 1:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\Reports\2014\7-15-2014\SP2014-004(CU Companies)-RESOLUTION.doc 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.