Laserfiche WebLink
Rear (west) 5' 17' <br /> Side (north) 0' 6' <br /> Side/Corner (south) 10' 20' <br /> As noted in the above table, all required parking lot setbacks are met. <br /> Off-Street Stalls <br /> Section 6-740(1) states that "off-street parking shall be provided at a ratio of four spaces per <br /> thousand square feet of floor area of retail, commercial and office development. For the <br /> purposes of this section net floor area shall mean floor area minus hallways, bathrooms, lobby, <br /> lunch/break rooms and the like." There are several factors that affect parking on this site, <br /> discussed below: <br /> The applicant indicates the net floor area of the 45,000 SF building is 27,007 SF for the purposes <br /> of calculating parking. Staff was initially concerned with only 60% of the floor area being <br /> calculated into required parking and requested an illustration depicting which spaces were <br /> deducted from the gross floor area (see attached Exhibit). Based on 27,007 SF, 108 parking <br /> stalls are required (27,007 / 1,000 x 4). The applicant's site plan depicts 87 on-site stalls. <br /> Additionally, 21 stalls are available on the street directly abutting the applicant's site, which are <br /> allowed to be included toward fulfilling the total parking requirement under Zoning Code <br /> Section 6-740(5). Thus, a total of 108 stalls are provided, meeting the minimum standard. For <br /> reference purposes, the existing 52,369 SF headquarters building contains 201 parking stalls. <br /> Working backwards, the headquarters site is parked based on 96% usable building square <br /> footage. This 96% assumes the second 9,048 SF building is not constructed. If constructed, the <br /> site would be parked at 82%. These scenarios assume 4 stalls are provided per 1,000 SF and <br /> illustrate how much less parking is being provided on the expansion property vs. their <br /> headquarters site. This is a function of the training use in the building. The applicant states in <br /> the supplemental narrative that trainees would be shuttled to the property. This will be <br /> imperative in ensuring the site does not have parking shortages. As such, staff has recommended <br /> a condition of approval related to this issue. <br /> Recognizing this facility is unique from other office buildings, and like their headquarters, is <br /> parked at a ratio less than a typical office building, staff requested a Proof-of-Parking Plan <br /> illustrating how many additional parking stalls could be accommodated on the property. This <br /> plan illustrates how an additional 19 stalls could be provided on-site. Staff expects the site to be <br /> adequately parked based on APi's proposed use of the building and the proof-of-parking plan <br /> illustrates how additional parking could be provided should APi's use of the building change to a <br /> use(s) demanding more parking. Looking to the future, staff also suspects that parking will be an <br /> issue for consideration when the applicant makes application for a PUD amendment to resolve <br /> the non-compliant land use approvals on the headquarters site (discussed in paragraph three <br /> under the Request& Background section of this report). <br /> One last point affecting parking is that the applicant intends to seek LEED (Leadership in Energy <br /> and Environmental Design) certification for the building. There are many factors that affect <br /> certification and one is that no additional hard surface, like parking, is built into the plan. The <br />