14-062 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

RBsor.urroNNo. L4-O62 Sr¡.rn orMrNxnsorl CouNrv orRavrsrY Crrv or Nnw BnrcHToN N MAKING FINoNcs o¡'Facr ¡,Np AppRovING A Sppcl¡,t Use PeRMn. Wnn As, an application has exl g Comprehensive Sign permit construction of and wo been made by CU Companies to permit an amendment to the Plan governing allowed signage at Main Street Village and which an additional ground sign and wall signs at 500 and 550 Main w the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1.application for a Special Use Permit was received on June 27,2014 Planning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notices,held a public hearing the hearing.July 15, 2014 and all present were given a chance to freely speak at Planning Commission recommended approval on July 15, 2014. City Council considered the request on July 22,2014. ls, the Planning Commission and City Council make the following Findings of Fact with to the Special use Permit (SP2014-004): 2. aJ. 4. 1. 2. J. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. property is zoned B - 4, Downtown Business. property is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for City Center. proposed use of the site consists of a multi-tenant ofÍice building. ZoningCode Section 9-041 Main Street Village is considered a renewal area and is thus itted to adopt a Comprehensive Sign Plan. the time of approval of the Main Street Village a Comprehensive Sign Plan it was noted several sign plan amendments would likely be necessary as businesses occupy the site. Companies proposes to construct an additional ground sign at the central main entrance along Main Street. sign would measure approximately 64 SF with a graphic area and design the existing ground sign. existing ground sign would be re-faced to match the new ground sign. I signage is proposed to be expanded, specifically to allow larger logo signs. Planning Commission and City Council reviewed the proposal in accordance with the lowing Comprehensive Sign Plan f,rndings of Zoning Code Section 9-041 (4). That the sign plan provides sound identification, reduction of clutter, and aesthetic enhancement. That the sign plan is sensitive to and compatible with physical circumstances of the site and buildings. That the sign plan is not detrimental to public safety. That the sign plan will not impede the normal and orderly placement of signs on surrounding properties. Planning Commission and City Council reviewed the proposal in accordance with the lowing Special Use Permit conditions of ZontngCode Section 8-130: \REPORTS\2014\Community Development\7-22-2014\SP2014-004 (CU Companies) - R-ESOLUTION.doc