Laserfiche WebLink
I " Of <br />the city that works for you <br />Council Worksession <br />September 2, 2014 <br />5:00 pm <br />Present: Mayor Dave Jacobsen <br />Councilmember Gina Bauman <br />Councilmember Brian Strub <br />Councilmember Paul Jacobsen <br />Councilmember Mary Burg <br />Absent: <br />Staff in Attendance: Dean Lotter, Brenda Davitt- Finance Director and Kevin Mannetter- Interim Finance <br />Director. <br />Guests in Attendance: <br />2015 Budget Discussion <br />Lotter reviewed the 2015 proposed budget with the Council in detail. He discussed the format of the budget <br />along with the significant changes planned for 2015. He provided comment on the shrinking middle class <br />along with COLA. He requested feedback from the Council on the budget and levy proposal. It was staff s <br />hope to have the levy certified at the September 9th Council meeting. <br />Councilmember Jacobsen asked how Obamacare would impact the 2015 budget. <br />Lotter reported the City would have higher fees in 2015 from Obamacare, however, this may be postponed to <br />2016. Further discussion ensued regarding the City's full and part-time employees, along with their insurance <br />benefits. <br />Councilmember Bauman asked how much LGA the City would be receiving in 2015. She expressed concern <br />that the City was using LGA year after year to reduce the levy and feared how the City would impacted if LGA <br />were to disappear. <br />Lotter explained the City would be receiving $554,000 in LGA from the State in 2015. He reported that the <br />2015 budget was consistent with the direction staff received from the Council. <br />Councilmember Bauman asked how the City had used the over - taxation money received from the County. She <br />believed this money should not have been taken or spent. Instead, it should have been used to reduce the levy <br />amount. <br />Lotter commented that those funds were being spent in the budget. <br />Councilmember Bauman reported the majority of the City's levy was spent on salaries, benefits and step <br />increases, and not for services. <br />Lotter indicated that the staff working for the City provide services. He questioned what the ideal budget <br />would look like. <br />Councilmember Bauman wanted to see no levy increase and wanted to know how the $554,000 was delegated. <br />She did not believe it was fair for New Brighton residents to assume an increase year after year when their <br />incomes were not increasing. <br />Lotter reiterated that the proposed levy would only increase taxes for the median home $11 per year. He <br />recommended that Councilmember Bauman to realize that the budget had to operate in the "real world" and <br />expect that there would be slight increases in expenses year after year. <br />Councilmember Burg believed that New Brighton was offering a high level of City services for its residents <br />and was only proposing a 1.9% levy increase. She was proud to say that the City had only a 1.9% increase. <br />