My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PC Packet 08-21-2012
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
PC Packets
>
2012
>
PC Packet 08-21-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2021 7:33:02 AM
Creation date
10/14/2014 10:18:55 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Congestion Management Safety Projects which have generally lower costs, but <br /> provide a higher overall system benefit. <br /> ■ Managed Lane Vision including Tier I and Tier II MnPASS corridors. <br /> ■ Strategic Capacity Enhancements. <br /> • Due to a shift in policy direction and increased costs, 12 major projects in the 2004 plan <br /> to add general purpose highway lanes are no longer in this fiscally constrained plan. <br /> While the preservation, safety, and mobility needs of these corridors are recognized, <br /> investments in these corridors will be focused on implementing active traffic <br /> management strategies, lower cost-high benefit projects, and implementing managed <br /> lanes (such as MnPASS lanes).The mobility funding for 2015 to 2020 has been allocated <br /> to the above noted investment categories and specific projects in the plan.The 2021 to <br /> 2030 funds have not yet been completely allocated. <br /> • In response to the 2007 collapse of the I-35W Bridge, the 2008 law directed a significant <br /> portion of the new state revenue toward bridge repair and replacement by 2018. Four <br /> major regional bridges (TH 52/Lafayette,TH 61/Hastings, I-35E/Cayuga, and TH 36/St. <br /> Croix River Bridge) will be built or rebuilt along with replacement or reconstruction of <br /> many lower volume bridges. <br /> • Modifications were made to Appendix D- Functional Classification Criteria, and <br /> Appendix E—Highway Interchange Requests. <br /> Transit System Plan changes since 2004: <br /> • Changes were made to the transitway plan map (Fig. 7-43) based on results of the 2008 <br /> Transit Master Study.The Transitway map no longer labels corridors as Tier I and Tier II, <br /> but rather labels Transitway corridors according to the stage of development and <br /> potential modes for the corridor. A number of new transitway corridors are identified, <br /> including corridors that should be developed as Arterial BRT. <br /> • The Locally Preferred Alternative for the Southwest Corridor is identified as LRT with an <br /> alignment following the Kenilworth corridor between downtown Minneapolis and St. <br /> Louis Park, and continuing into Hopkins, Minnetonka and Eden Prairie. <br /> • The Union Depot in downtown St. Paul and The Interchange in downtown Minneapolis <br /> are identified as regional multimodal hubs serving the transitways. <br /> • The 2004 transit plan showed a map of local arterial bus corridors. While an updated <br /> version of that map remains, potential Arterial BRT transitway corridors are now defined <br /> as well (Fig. 7-43). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.